[sclug] spamassassin taking too long

[David Given]

On Wednesday 22 February 2006 09:02, darren at davisononline.org wrote:
[...]
> Is this just something I have to accept with sa or can I do something about
> it?  If it's going to cause the server to choke on the small volume of mail
> I receive and therefore let spam in anyway, it kind of defeats the purpose
> of using it.  How do other sa users find this?

I can't comment on your specific problem, other than noting that SA is very 
resource hungry and managed to kill my server completely serveral times when 
processing large quantities of mail, but I gave up on SA a while ago simply 
because it wasn't working any more. These days I use DSPAM, which is much 
faster as well as being more accurate.

-- 
+- David Given --McQ-+ "Turning, pages turning in the widening bath,
|  dg at cowlark.com    | The spine cannot bear the humidity.
| (dg at tao-group.com) | Books fall apart; the binding cannot hold.
+- www.cowlark.com --+ Page 129 is loosed upon the world." --- Zarf
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.tmdg.co.uk/pipermail/sclug/attachments/20060222/bb3ae57d/attachment.bin