[sclug] Standard of language

[David Given]

haughtonomous wrote:
> It is
> obvious what the intention is, but would you consider it 'acceptable'?

The answer is, of course, 'it depends'.

Is this part of a sequence of 50 very similar clauses, where 45 of them 
have code in the 'true' clause and 5 don't? Then yes, not only is it 
acceptable but it's also good practice, because it's important to 
maintain visual similarity between each clause to enhance maintainability.

-- 
???? ?????????????? ????? http://www.cowlark.com ?????
?
? "They laughed at Newton. They laughed at Einstein. Of course, they
? also laughed at Bozo the Clown." --- Carl Sagan