[Scottish] Re: News Letter April 08

[Claudio Calvelli]

> Kyle Gordon wrote:
[trimmed]
> > Top posting worked just fine in that context due to the reply not 
> > addressing any part of the post in particular.
> 
> TOP POSTING NEVER WORKS FINE.
> 
> A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
> Q. Why is top posting bad?

While top posting is evil in general, in this case it was more like:

statement: a style of post is bad
example: the quoted post

So the logical sequence was correct.

C (No generalisation is ever correct; including this one)