[Scottish] Re: News Letter April 08

Claudio Calvelli slug at intercal.dyn-o-saur.com
Sat Apr 12 08:01:06 BST 2008

> Kyle Gordon wrote:
> > Top posting worked just fine in that context due to the reply not 
> > addressing any part of the post in particular.
> A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
> Q. Why is top posting bad?

While top posting is evil in general, in this case it was more like:

statement: a style of post is bad
example: the quoted post

So the logical sequence was correct.

C (No generalisation is ever correct; including this one)

More information about the Scottish mailing list