[Sderby] Software Patents
m at andromeda
m at andromeda-it.co.uk
Sat Oct 18 11:34:29 BST 2003
I complained to my MEP about the EU legislation on software patents.
His reply follows....
Dear Dr Read,
Re: The patenting of computer-implemented inventions ("software patents")
Thank you for your email expressing your concerns with the European
Commission's proposal for a Directive on the patentability of
computer-implemented inventions. I apologise for the lengthy delay in
replying, but the issue only came to the European Parliament's plenary
session at the end of last month.
The need for legal certainty in this area, by the introduction of EU
legislation. is pressing due to the drift in the USA to allow the
patenting of computer software. Small and medium-sized enterprises in
particular have been concerned that patenting will restrict their ability
to write new and better software without infringing the rules. At the
same time, SMEs will also benefit from the legal certainty that will be
established by this Directive.
The European Parliament voted its first reading on the proposal in
September where it adopted amendments to strictly limit patents to new
inventions only. The Parliament's position would harmonise current
practice in the European Patents Office, and ensure that patents in the
field of computer engineering will be issued on the same basis in all EU
Member States. Specifically, the UK Liberal Democrats supported an
amendment to the definition, so that "In order to be patentable, a
computer-implemented invention must be susceptible of industrial
application and new and involve an inventive step. In order to involve an
inventive step, a computer-implemented invention must make a technical
contribution".
Equally importantly, the Parliament proposed that what cannot be patented
should also be tightened-up. So, a computer-implemented invention shall
not be regarded as making a 'technical contribution' merely because it
involves the use of a computer, network or other programmable apparatus -
or because it improves efficiency in the use of resources within the data
processing system.
The proposal now passes to the Council of Ministers where the 15 EU Member
States will discuss the proposal and, in due course, modify the text (the
Council's common position). However, they are not obliged to take on
board Parliament's amendments. Once the Council has adopted its common
position the proposal will pass back to the Parliament for a second
reading, before its final adoption.
Diana Wallis MEP, lib dem member of the European Parliament's Legal
Affairs Committee, led the debate in the Parliament on behalf of the
British lib dem MEPs. If you have further specific queries regarding the
vote, you might wish to contact her directly at the following address:
Diana Wallis MEP
European Parliament ASP 10G253
60 rue Wiertz
B-1047 Brussels
Belgium
dwallis at europarl.eu.int
Yours sincerely,
Nick Clegg
More information about the Sderby
mailing list