[Sussex] LINUX takes on XServe
Tony Dart
tdart at btinternet.com
Tue Oct 29 23:32:01 UTC 2002
On Tuesday, October 29, 2002, at 03:55 PM, Steve Dobson wrote:
> All
>
> On 29 October 2002 at 14:17 wisely wrote:
> <snip>
>> The reviewer points to a few things about virtual memory and
>> the like. One point he didn't make (and Steve will back will agree
>> vigorously with this) is that OS X is a Micokernel architecture
>> (Mach 3) and LINUX is a Monolithic kernel architecture. In General
>> microkernels are slower than Monolithic kernels (although this is
>> not always the case).
>
Quote from Apples UNIX Porting Guide:
Although Mac OS X must credit BSD for most of the underlying levels of
the operating system, Mac OS X also owes a major debt to Mach. The
kernel is heavily influenced in its design philosophy by Carnegie
Mellon's Mach project. The kernel is not a pure microkernel
implementation though since the address space is shared with BSD
processes.
end of quote.
;-)
Tony
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 1022 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/sussex/attachments/20021029/e08b9b23/attachment.bin
More information about the Sussex
mailing list