[Sussex] RE: The 'D' programming language

Dominic dominic.clay at btinternet.com
Sat Feb 22 17:03:02 UTC 2003


Fantastic...
This means I can continue working with the OS that I am growing to
appreciate more and more.  I can learn to work with languages such as C++
and Perl whilst being able to keep up with the skills required to keep me
employed :)

Another winner from the open source community!

...or should I read a bit closer?  Surely it can't be that easy?...  I'll
find out soon.

Dominic


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Harrison" <Mark at ascentium.co.uk>
To: <sussex at mailman.lug.org.uk>
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Sussex] RE: The 'D' programming language


> Common misconception about .NET, I'm afraid. .NET is a framework, not a
> language, and I'd say that its only real competitor is J2EE.
>
> Visual Studio is a .NET development tool and is limited to the Windows
> platform and three languages (Basic, C++, C#)... well actually, J# is
_sort_
> of there as well, but let's not go there :-)
>
> The .NET framework, however,  is available for a number of platforms,
> including Linux, where, as we might hope, it's available open source. Look
> at http://www.go-mono.com/ for one solution.
>
> The .NET framework is likewise available for a "large number" of
languages.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Dobson" <SDobson at manh.com>
> To: <sussex at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 12:17 PM
> Subject: RE: [Sussex] RE: The 'D' programming language
>
>
> [...]
>
> > I think .NET has another draw back - it is limited to only one platform!
> >
> > Steve
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sussex mailing list
> Sussex at mailman.lug.org.uk
> http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/sussex





More information about the Sussex mailing list