Why is gnome better? RE: [Sussex] Promoting SLUG
Geoff Teale
gteale at cmedltd.com
Wed Jun 30 13:29:47 UTC 2004
Thomas Adam wrote:
>Perhaps, but the *amount* it takes up should not infringe on that. There
>should be the option of unloading all the fluff if need be so that it is
>relatively non-intensive.
>
>
Put simply - you _can_.
>I diagree with that completely. Ok, so I rarely use a GUI, but to be
>honest there are a number of things that I do that simply *require* an
>Xserver to be running.
>
>
Fair enough. But then you should be using somehting lightweight and not
expecting something like GNOME to do the job. Horses for courses. If
you want a minimal window manager out of the box then TWM is your
friend. TWM users can look at FVWM and Fluxbox users and laugh at the
*huge* amounts of memory they waste.
>I am not that bothered.
>
>
Very few people are... ;-)
>Then you're probably not doing it correctly. :)
>
>
.... er... yuh... I kinda figured... ;-)
--
Geoff
More information about the Sussex
mailing list