[Sussex] Distros
Geoffrey J. Teale
gteale at cmedltd.com
Tue Apr 5 11:08:12 UTC 2005
"Chris Jones" <cmsj at tenshu.net> writes:
> Hi
Hello
> Or running well integrated banking software,
Eh? Most of the big banks run their operations on Linux post 9/11 -
are you talking about Microsoft Money type software?
> or doing the things GIMP
> can't manage yet,
This is an increasingly small set of things. I know of several print
shops and design organisations who believe that the GIMP is actually a
far better environment than photoshop now. The real problem is that
designers know there way around photoshop and don't want to learn a
new tool.
>or editing a video,
Hmmm.. odd because not only are there several excellent tools to do
this, but major Holywood movies have been edited with free software.
>or... the list goes on and on.
Yes there are admittedly a number of specialist applications out there
that are not yet covered by Free Software, but the core platform is
really very well served now.
> It's just worth an absolute fortune ;)
Yup. How is that a priority? Yes we'd love games to be free
software, but it's a losing battle right now so we don't fight it
particularly hard with our limited resources.
> These international arguments are certainly very good and more morally
> compelling than anything FSF related.
> I am tempted though to argue that anything which prevents developing
> nations being sucked into the same insane way of living we have in the
> west could be considered a good thing ;)
:-) Unfortunately they are in our world and suffering because of it.
> Of course if FSF had managed to nail the Hurd developers down into
> actually releasing some software at some point then they could have had
> their own OS out there for ages now ;)
The HURD is no more or less "Free" than the Linux kernel. If the FSF
was interested in maintaining a distro it could have been doing so
since the first GPL'd linux kernel in the early 1990s.
> I think RMS is a crackpot, but a well-intentioned, useful crackpot :)
Fair enough :-)
> Perhaps this is the key difference here, I am not passionate about Free
> Software specifically, it's just better generally so I like it when I can
> use it ;)
That may be, but you use under the terms defined by the licensor, at
that licensor generally would like you to remember exactly what using
that software means.
--
Geoff Teale
CMed Technology - gteale at cmedresearch.com
Free Software Foundation - tealeg at member.fsf.org
/^\v/^\v/^\v/^\v/^\v/^\v/^\v/^\v/^\v/^\v/^\v/^\v/^\v/
More information about the Sussex
mailing list