[Sussex] Seen this: Fwd: [Fsfe-uk] EP rejects Software Patent Directive, 648 to 14, 18 abstentions

[Geoffrey Teale]

----------  Forwarded Message  ----------

Subject: [Fsfe-uk] EP rejects Software Patent Directive, 648 to 14, 18 
abstentions
Date: Wednesday 06 July 2005 11:46
From: Blanked for privacy
To: fsfe-uk at gnu.org

PRESS RELEASE FFII -- [ Europe / economy / ICT ]

=============================================================================
=== Parliament says No to Software Patents
=============================================================================
===

Strasbourg, 6 July 2005 -- The European Parliament today decided by
a margin of 648 votes to 14, with 18 absentions, to _reject_ the
directive "on the patentability of computer implemented inventions",
also known as the software patent directive.

This rejection was the logical answer to the Commission's
refusal to restart the legislative process in February and the
Council's unwillingness to take the will of the European Parliament
and national parliaments into account.  The FFII congratulates the
European Parliament on its clear "No" to bad legislative proposals and
procedures.

This is a great victory for those who have campaigned to ensure that
European innovation and competitiveness is protected from
monopolisation of software functionalities and business methods. It
marks the end of an attempt by the European Commission and
governmental patent officials to impose detrimental and legally
questionable practises of the European Patent Office (EPO) on the
member states.  However the questions created by this practise remain
unsolved.  FFII believes that the Parliament's work, in particular the
21 cross-party compromise amendments, can provide a good basis on
which future solutions, both at the national and European level, can
build.

Jonas Maebe, FFII Board Member, comments on the outcome of today's vote:

   "This result clearly shows that thorough analysis, genuinely concerned
   citizens and factual information have more impact than free ice-cream,
   boatloads of hired lobbyists and outsourcing threats. I hope this turn
   of events can give some people faith again in the European decision
   making process. I also hope that it will encourage the Council and
   Commission to emulate the European Parliament to improve transparency
   and the ability of stakeholders to participate in the decision-making
   process irrespective of their size."

Hartmut Pilch, president of FFII, explains why FFII supported the
move for rejection in its voting recommendations:

   In recent days, the big holders of EPO-granted software patents and
   their MEPs, who had previously been campaigning for the Council's
   "Common Position", joined the call for rejection of the directive
   because it became clear that the 21 cross-party amendments
   championned by Rhoitová, Buzek, Rocard and Duff were very likely to
   be adopted by the Parliament.  It was well noticeable that support
   for these amendments or a substantial part thereof was becoming the
   mainstream opinion in all political groups.  Yet there would not
   have been much of a point in such a vote.  We rather agree to the
   assessment of the situation as given by Othmar Karas MEP in the
   Plenary yesterday: a No was the only logical answer to the
   unconstructive attitude and legally questionable manuevers of the
   Commission and Council, by which this so-called Common Position had
   come about in the first place.

The FFII also wishes to thank all those people who have taken the time
to contact their representatives either by email, phone or in
person. We also want to thank the numerous volunteers who have given
so generously of their time and energy. This is your victory as well
as the Parliament's.

======================================================================
Background information and further news
======================================================================

* 21 cross-party compromise amendments
   http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/europarl0309/amends05/komprom0506.en.pdf

* FFII voting recommendations for MEPs at today's plenary vote
   http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/europarl0309/amends05/ffiivotlst050706.pdf

* Practise of the European Patent Office
   http://webshop.ffii.org/
   http://swpat.ffii.org/patents/
   http://gauss.ffii.org/

* Karas speech in the plenary yesterday
   http://wiki.ffii.org/Karas05075En

* Wallstreet Journal reports prominently about Lehne's conflicts of interest
   http://wiki.ffii.org/WsjLehne050705En

* Stay tuned to our news ticker
   http://wiki.ffii.org/SwpatcninoEn

-- 
Geoffrey Teale
Cmed Research