[Sussex] Curious problem - sound related ???
John D.
johnsemail at f2s.com
Fri Apr 21 17:24:18 UTC 2006
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 22:33, Stephen Williams wrote:
> John,
>
> Here are some typical values from my install (Gentoo - what else)
> running amaroK. These are a few values sampled at 1 sec intervals. Note
> the resource usage is a lot less than yours.
>
> CPU% MEM%
>
> 13379 1 1:05.93 7.9 4.3 15 0 S 139m 96m 42m 1000 amarokapp
> 13379 1 1:06.01 7.9 4.3 16 0 R 139m 96m 42m 1000 amarokapp
> 13379 1 1:06.09 7.9 4.3 16 0 S 139m 96m 42m 1000 amarokapp
> 13379 1 1:06.16 6.9 4.3 15 0 S 139m 96m 42m 1000 amarokapp
> 13379 1 1:06.24 7.9 4.3 16 0 S 139m 96m 42m 1000 amarokapp
> 13379 1 1:06.32 7.9 4.3 16 0 S 139m 96m 42m 1000 amarokapp
> 13379 1 1:06.41 8.9 4.3 16 0 R 139m 96m 42m 1000 amarokapp
> 13379 1 1:06.52 10.9 4.3 15 0 S 139m 96m 42m 1000 amarokapp
> 13379 1 1:06.61 8.9 4.3 16 0 R 139m 96m 42m 1000 amarokapp
> 13379 1 1:06.69 7.9 4.3 16 0 S 139m 96m 42m 1000 amarokapp
>
> CPU rarely goes above 10% and memory rarely exceeds 5%. No skipping at
> all. A few thoughts occur:
>
> 1. Try running amaroK using the Xine engine as opposed to the arts
> engine - see if there's a difference.
>
> 2. You could run artswrapper suid, but this is a security risk.
>
> 3. Otherwise there mat be some problem with memory management. Something
> wrong with they way your amaroK is compiled?
Hum?
Well I have Xine installed, but Xine engine ? I currently can't find anything
like that mentioned for either the app, kde or in the main mandriva config
windows.
Damn! and I sure I've seen it mentioned somewhere.
regards
John D.
More information about the Sussex
mailing list