[Sussex] Why Linux doesn't need defrag
Alan Pope
alan at popey.com
Thu Aug 17 12:59:48 UTC 2006
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 05:29:01AM -0600, linux at oneandoneis2.org wrote:
> http://geekblog.oneandoneis2.org/index.php/2006/08/17/why_doesn_t_linux_need_defragmenting
>
> I *think* I got the basic details right, but I'm not absolutely sure,
> so any feedback would be appreciated.
>
I don't agree with:-
"Linux pays attention to the hard drive's actual geometry, and would not
split this file so badly."
I was under the impression that Linux has no clue about the real physical
geometry of the disk because that's abstracted by the circuitry on the
drive/controller. As far as Linux is concerned it's a large number of
sectors, it has no clue *really* how they're arranged.
That's my understanding anyway.
Cheers,
Al.
More information about the Sussex
mailing list