[Sussex] Why Linux doesn't need defrag

Alan Pope alan at popey.com
Thu Aug 17 12:59:48 UTC 2006


On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 05:29:01AM -0600, linux at oneandoneis2.org wrote:
> http://geekblog.oneandoneis2.org/index.php/2006/08/17/why_doesn_t_linux_need_defragmenting
> 
> I *think* I got the basic details right, but I'm not absolutely sure,  
> so any feedback would be appreciated.
> 

I don't agree with:-

"Linux pays attention to the hard drive's actual geometry, and would not
split this file so badly."

I was under the impression that Linux has no clue about the real physical
geometry of the disk because that's abstracted by the circuitry on the
drive/controller. As far as Linux is concerned it's a large number of
sectors, it has no clue *really* how they're arranged.

That's my understanding anyway.

Cheers,
Al.




More information about the Sussex mailing list