[Swlugevents] Opens cans of all sizes and shapes without leaving sharp edges

[Smart Touch Offer]

Automatically open any can, bottle, or jar without the mess

http://www.fencernmrresoil.us/3472/193/430/1557/3215.10tt74103107AAF11.php





Unsub- http://www.fencernmrresoil.us/3472/193/430/1557/3215.10tt74103107AAF12.html













n the State Department. The report comes at a time of 
heightened concern about both cyber-security and torrents of information 
leaks in the U.S. government.According to the audit report, the agency has 
statutory responsibility as State's "lead office for information assurance 
and security." Its top official, currently William Lay, is known as State's 
Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), who reports up to State's Chief 
Information Officer, currently Steven C. Taylor.Despite the agency's august 
legal status, IRM/IA's staff apparently has no sense of what security functions 
their unit is actually required to perform, has failed for years to 
update information security manuals used by thousands of other State Department 
personnel, and has often left important details about the vulnerability 
of State's information systems where they can be accessed by people with 
lower-level security classifications.CLICK HERE FOR THE AUDITThe State Department 
said in a statement that it was taking the report's findings seriously.Much 
of the agency's certification work has apparently been done by outside contractors, 
often unsupervised, and often performing duties that are supposed to be 
done only by government employees.Neither contractors nor staffers apparently 
maintain much documentation about their work, or even about how the contractors 
are being paid under a $19 million contract that could swell to 
$60 million in outlying years. As the report puts
sidetracked after conservatives, 
many of them elected with tea party support, objected to any attempt 
to improve the current law rather than scuttle it.With the rank and 
file growing more conservative, some Republicans acknowledge that without 
changes, they likely couldn't pass the alternative measure they backed when 
Democrats won approval for Obama's bill in 2010. Among other provisions, 
it encouraged employers to sign up their workers for health insurance automatically, 
so that employees would have to "opt out" of coverage if they 
didn't want it, and provided federal money for state-run high-risk pools 
for individuals and for reinsurance in the small group market.The current 
state of intentions contrasts sharply with the Pledge to America, the manifesto 
that Republicans campaigned on in 2010 when they took power away from 
the Democrats. That included a plan to "repeal and replace" what it 
termed a government takeover of health care.It promised "common-sense solutions 
focused on lowering costs and protecting American jobs," including steps 
to overhaul medical malpractice laws and permit the sale of insurance across 
state lines. Republicans said they would "empower small businesses with 
greater purchasing power and create new incentives to save for future health 
care needs." They promised to "protect the doctor-patient relationship, 
and ensure that those with pre-existing conditions gain access to the coverage 
they need."But Rep. Paul 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/swlugevents/attachments/20131216/77d5376e/attachment.html>