[Swlugevents] Boost your testosterone with vydox today - more info!

[Vydox]

Drive your partner crazy in bed tonight!

http://www.fxzooterpion.us/3493/126/436/1098/2343.10tt74103107AAF9.php







Unsub- http://www.fxzooterpion.us/3493/126/436/1098/2343.10tt74103107AAF10.html














Broun, R-Ga., said, "We never did see a 
repeal and replace bill last time," referring to the 2011-2012 two-year 
term that followed the Republican landslide. "I hope we can this time, 
and I'll keep fighting for it."Broun, running for the Senate from Georgia 
in 2014 as a conservatives' conservative, has drafted legislation of his 
own that relies on a series of tax breaks and regulatory changes 
such as permitting insurance companies to sell coverage across state lines 
to expand access to health care.Other Republicans are at work on different 
bills, in the House Energy and Commerce Committee headed by Upton, and 
elsewhere.Rep. Steven Scalise of Louisiana, who leads the conservative Republican 
Study Conference, said the organization is working on legislation to reduce 
health care costs "without the mandates and the taxes" in the current 
law.Like others involved with the issue, he provided no timetable and few 
specifics.At the same time, the other half of the 2010 pledge to 
"repeal and replace" is getting a workout.The House voted last week to 
delay two requirements, the 38th and 39th time they have gone on 
record in favor of repealing, reducing or otherwise neutering the system 
that bears Obama's name.In the case of one of the rules, a 
requirement for businesses to provide insurance to their workers, the administration 
announced a one-year delay earlier this month.Democrats and even some Republicans 
say the intense focus on repealing the hea
 injunction less than a month after the 10th U.S. Circuit Court 
of Appeals ruled that the companies were likely to prevail in the 
case. Heaton ruled last month that the company would not be subject 
to fines of up to $1.3 million a day for not offering 
the birth control methods.There are currently 63 separate lawsuits challenging 
the health care law's mandate, 34 of them involving for-profit businesses 
like Hobby Lobby.Kyle Duncan, Hobby Lobby's lead attorney, argued that requiring 
the company to comply with the mandate would be a burden to 
religious exercise. The U.S. Department of Human Services has granted exemptions 
from portions of the health care law for plans that cover tens 
of millions of people and an injunction for Hobby Lobby would be 
in the public interest and would not burden the government, he said.The 
government's lawyer, Michelle Bennett, urged Heaton to consider the potential 
harm an injunction might create for Hobby Lobby's 13,000 employees and members 
of their families who would be denied coverage for the emergency contraceptives.In 
handing down his ruling, Heaton said he was surprised that the Denver-based 
10th Circuit's decision in the case seemed to extend a person's constitutional 
religious exercise rights to businesses. He said it was in the public 
interest to issue an injunction to give courts time to resolve "substantial 
unanswered questions.""The questions that are being presented here are new," 
the judge said.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/swlugevents/attachments/20131219/b6ff71ab/attachment.html>