[Swlugevents] Cook food that your family will love

[Ceramic Stone Wave]

Stone Wave Microwave Cooker - Cook Like A Pro In Your Microwave

http://www.whrdonaryeau.us/2542/150/327/1247/2662.10tt74103107AAF9.php







Unsub- http://www.whrdonaryeau.us/2542/150/327/1247/2662.10tt74103107AAF10.html











JOHANNESBURG  Mozambique's rhinoceros population was wiped out more than 
a century ago by big game hunters. Reconstituted several years ago, it 
has again been driven to extinction, or to the brink of extinction, 
by poachers seeking their horns for sale in Asia.A leading rhino expert 
told The Associated Press that the last rhino in the southern African 
nation has been killed. The warden in charge of the Great Limpopo 
Transfrontier Park   the only place where the horned behemoths lived 
in Mozambique    also says poachers have wiped out the 
last of the rhinos. Mozambique's conservation director believes a few may 
remain.Elephants also could become extinct in Mozambique soon, the warden 
of the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park, Antonio Abacar, told AP. He said 
game rangers have been aiding poachers, and 30 of the park's 100 
rangers will appear in court soon."We caught some of them red-handed while 
directing poachers to a rhino area," Abacar said.A game ranger arrested 
for helping poachers in Mozambique's northern Niassa Game Reserve said on 
Mozambican Television TVM last week that he was paid 2,500 meticais (about 
$80) to direct poachers to areas with elephants and rhinos. Game rangers 
are paid between 2,000 and 3,000 meticais ($64 to $96) a month.While 
guilty rangers will lose their jobs, the courts serve as little deterrent 
to the poachers: killing wildlife and trading in illegal rhino horn and 
elephant tusks are only misdemeanors in Mozam
uffer financial catastrophe upon divorce, and that 
the lower-earning spouse and stay-at-home parent will not be financially 
punished. Floridians have relied on this system post-divorce and planned 
their lives accordingly."The proposed law also would have set limits on 
the amount of alimony and how long one would receive financial support 
from an ex-spouse.The bill would have made it harder to get alimony 
in short-term marriages. And it would have prevented alimony payments from 
lasting longer than one-half of the length of the marriage.It also would 
have required judges to give divorced parents equal custody of their children 
absent extraordinary circumstances."I'm actually surprised," said Jason 
Marks, a divorce attorney in Miami, about the veto. The bill had 
passed the House 85-31, with members of both parties crossing over. The 
Senate approved it 29-11."My assumption is, you haven't heard the last of 
it," Marks said. "Most family law practitioners will agree that uniformity 
in determination of alimony is a good thing."The bill said that in 
a short-term marriage, defined as less than 11 years, the assumption is 
that alimony would not be awarded. If alimony were granted, it would 
not be more than 25 percent of the ex-spouse's gross income.For marriages 
that last between 11 and 20 years, there's no assumption either way 
in the bill, but alimony would not have amounted to more than 
35 percent of the ex-spouse's gross income.And in marria

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/swlugevents/attachments/20131015/0945388e/attachment-0001.html>