[Swlugevents] Are You Online? See Pics of Singles Now!

[Match.com]

Dating News: 1 in 5 Relationships Start Online - Meet Singles Today!

http://www.edbuddhashoer.com/2111/107/216/996/1997.12tt74103107AAF18.php







Unsub- http://www.edbuddhashoer.com/2111/107/216/996/1997.12tt74103107AAF8.html











ommitted to dealing with 
the gang problem that is tormenting honest people in his hometown as 
he is to blaming law-abiding gun owners for the acts of psychopathic 
murderers."House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, repeated his view that the 
Senate should act, saying, "It's one thing for two members to come 
to some agreement. It doesn't substitute the will for the other 98 
members."In a written statement, Obama said he'd prefer stronger language 
than the compromise, but he said it represented progress."It recognizes 
that there are good people on both sides of this issue, and 
we don't have to agree on everything to know that we've got 
to do something to stem the tide of gun violence," he said.Other 
highlights of Obama's gun agenda -- including bans on assault weapons and 
high-capacity ammunition magazines -- seem to have little chance of winning 
approval in the Senate, let alone the House.Polls show more than 8 
in 10 people back expanded background checks. Even so, the fight will 
be difficult in both chambers, especially the House, where increasing numbers 
of district lines are drawn to protect incumbents, said James Pasco, executive 
director of the Fraternal Order of Police."They're not going to have a 
constituency in every instance that is champing for that bill," said Pasco, 
whose group has backed the drive for expanded background checks.The director 
of Mayors Against Illegal Guns, one of whose leaders is New York 
City Mayor Michael Bloo
at."We've 
struck the right balance," said Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., the committee's 
chairman. "It's 100 percent voluntary. There are no big mandates in this 
bill, and industry says under these conditions they think they can share 
(information), and the government can give them information that might protect 
them."The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, or CISPA, is widely 
backed by industry groups that say businesses are struggling to defend against 
aggressive and sophisticated attacks from hackers in China, Russia and Eastern 
Europe.Privacy and civil liberties groups have long opposed the bill because 
they say it opens America's commercial records to the federal government 
without putting a civilian agency in charge, such as the Homeland Security 
Department or Commerce Department. That leaves open the possibility that 
the National Security Agency or another military or intelligence office 
would become involved, they said. While the new program would be intended 
to transmit only technical threat data, opponents said they worried that 
personal information could be passed along, too.Democratic Reps. Adam Schiff 
of California and Jan Schakowsky of Illinois were the lone dissenters. At 
a press conference, they said they would push for amendments on the 
House floor next week that would specifically bar the military from taking 
a central role in data collection and instead put the Homeland Security 
Department in charge. They also 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/swlugevents/attachments/20130903/f66116cb/attachment.html>