[Swlugevents] Loose Up To 8 Ponds a Week Without Dieting! Boost Up Your Metabolism with Pure Garcinia Extract!

[Best Weight Loss Extract]

100% Organic Weight Loss!


http://www.lwplcieauryl.us/2275/29/71/158/431.10tt74103107AAF17.php



To Unsub - http://www.lwplcieauryl.us/2275/29/71/158/431.10tt74103107AAF10.html

PO Box 26452
Minneapolis, MN 55426
















 ies to collect sales taxes if the store has a physical 
presence in the state. As a result, many online sales are essentially 
tax-free, giving Internet retailers an advantage over brick-and-mortar stores.While 
Republicans generally oppose higher taxes -- and agreed to an increase on 
top earners as part of the fiscal crisis deal only after negotiating 
a narrower hike than the administration originally envisioned -- supporters 
of the Internet sales tax bill insist it is not a tax 
increase.Instead, they say, the bill merely provides states with a mechanism 
to enforce current taxes."This bill has nothing to do with imposing any 
kind of new tax or revenue generator," said Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn. 
"What this law does is allow states that already have laws on 
the books to carry out the implementation of those" laws."South Dakota Gov. 
Dennis Daugaard, a Republican, called it a "matter of equity and fairness.""The 
same people who are selling the same products should be paying the 
same taxes," he said.Supporters say the bill is about fairness for businesses 
and lost revenue for states.But opponents say it would impose complicated 
regulations on retailers and doesn't have enough protections for small businesses. 
Businesses with less than $1 million a year in online sales would 
be exempt.While online giant Amazon has come around to the tax, major 
online retailers like eBay are strongly opposing it.Many of the nation's 
governors -- Republicans and De
 assaulted    because 
they were perceived as gay. About 13 percent of lesbians said the 
same.A separate study of young people in England also found that, in 
their teens, gay boys and lesbians were almost twice as likely to 
be bullied as their straight peers. By young adulthood, it was about 
the same for lesbians and straight girls. But in this study, published 
recently in the journal Pediatrics, gay young men were almost four times 
more likely than their straight peers to be bullied.At least one historian 
says it wasn't always that way for either men or women, whose 
"expressions of love" with friends of the same gender were seen as 
a norm    even idealized    in the 
19th century."These relationships offered ample opportunity for those who 
would have wanted to act on it physically, even if most did 
not," says Thomas Foster, associate professor and head of the history department 
at DePaul University in Chicago.Today's "code of male gendered behavior," 
he says, often rejects these kinds of expressions between men.We joke about 
the "bro-mance"    a term used to describe close friendships 
between straight men. But in some sense, the humor stems from the 
insinuation that those relationships could be romantic, though everyone 
assumes they aren't.Call those friends "gay," a word that's still commonly 
used as an insult, and that's quite another thing. Consider the furor 
over Rutgers University men's basketball coach Mike Rice, who was recently 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/swlugevents/attachments/20130917/28d75da9/attachment.html>