[Swlugevents] Say goodbye to weight loss pills

[Marz Spray]

As seen on ABC's Shark Tank

http://www.thungradulaep.us/l/lt24WNH5180IJEE194O/438AMEI1563C3234UGPEX10P74103107TMXRG1410730897






Unsub- http://www.thungradulaep.us/l/lc10TRC5180LNKQ194L/438AXVJ1563E3234BAENH10O74103107REXJK1410730897














e Syrians determine their own fate, so arming the opposition is 
more palatable than direct U.S. intervention.The administration announced 
last week that it believes Assad has used chemical weapons but said 
the intelligence wasn't clear enough to be certain that the regime has 
crossed President Barack Obama's announced "red line" of definite chemical 
weapons use that he said would have "enormous consequences" for Assad's 
government.Some senior leaders, including Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman 
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, are skeptical about the wisdom of 
providing arms to such a broad and complex mix of opposition groups. 
But officials say there is a growing realization that, under increasing 
pressure from Congress and other allied nations, the U.S. might soon have 
to do more for the Free Syrian Army.The two-year civil war has 
left an estimated 70,000 people dead and hundreds of thousands of refugees.High-level 
meetings on the latest developments in the issue have been going on 
all week, including one between Dempsey and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, 
who just returned from the Mideast.According to a U.S. official and a 
U.N. diplomat, intelligence agencies are looking into allegations that chemical 
weapons were used in Syria after the two March 19 attacks that 
U.S., British, French and Qatari officials have referred to. They provided 
no details on the new alleged attacks.This emerging shift within the administration 
comes even as Assad a
d not even prevent one of the accused bombers from re-entering the 
country as a student despite flunking out of school, it drives conservatives 
up a wall. After all, why should security measures that might protect 
innocent lives be contingent on an immigration bargain? Why should Democrats 
be able to withhold their support for better security and enforcement?The 
answer, of course, is that all that is required of Democrats to 
win is for them to do nothing. Like the NRA on mass 
shootings, Democrats need only for nothing to happen in order to get 
their way. Republicans find the status quo intolerable now, Democrats are 
willing to wait knowing that the longer they wait, the more advantageous 
the eventual plan will be to their interests.And Now, A Word From 
CharlesBenghazi happened a long time ago. That's the definition of chutzpah. 
This administration has stonewalled every inquiry and delayed its answers 
and not released names and told all kinds of stories, and they 
are saying it is an old story.-- Charles Krauthammer on Special Report 
with Bret Baier.Chris Stirewalt is digital politics editor for Fox News, 
and his POWER PLAY column appears Monday-Friday on FoxNews.com. Catch Chris 
Live online daily at 11:30amET at http:live.foxnews.com.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/swlugevents/attachments/20140417/14a3015b/attachment.html>