[Watford] Python problem

[Peter Grant]

I think the SIP phones is an entirely internal matter, mostly relating
to failing phone systems, extra buildings which the current system
wouldn't be able to expand to, and the size problems we could face if
we gamble on the currently elderly phone system not failing for
another year or two. The price of £76 a phone doesn't make things look
so nice, or the two extra 48 port PoE switches we need to power them!
Peter

"When you have a Swiss Army knife of a mind, everything looks like it
should be dismantled." Danny O'Brien/Merlin Mann



On 24 January 2012 19:41, Steve Horsley <steve.horsley at gmail.com> wrote:
> Glad I could help. Thanks for the feedback.
>
> I can't help selling the sip phones though. Good luck with that.
>
> Steve.
>
> On Jan 24, 2012 7:36 PM, "Peter Grant" <grantpe at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Steve, your re-coding works perfectly for my case at least!
>> Then to persuade the powers with the money to let us spend out on
>> about 90 brand new SIP phones, I think I might be mad....
>> Peter
>>
>> "When you have a Swiss Army knife of a mind, everything looks like it
>> should be dismantled." Danny O'Brien/Merlin Mann
>>
>>
>>
>> On 20 January 2012 18:12, Ishaq <ishaqx at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Steve Horsely? Once upon a time of C&W fame :) ?
>> >
>> > Mohammad
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Steve Horsley <steve.horsley at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I'd be happy to have a look.
>> >> If you can send me a sample of the offending code, and input that is
>> >> validating wrongly, and an explanation of what you think is wrong.
>> >>
>> >> Steve
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 20 January 2012 13:59, Peter Grant <grantpe at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi everyone,
>> >>> Is there a python programmer in the group? I've got a bug which is
>> >>> giving major grief in a setup script for sipXecs (VoIP server), I
>> >>> think I've isolated the problem down to one small peice of python
>> >>> script, but I don't have the skills to correct it. Could anyone help?
>> >>> Sadly, this bug is unlikely to be fixed by the main project as it's
>> >>> consider to be 'minor' so they decided not to fix it. It's a problem
>> >>> with the setup script and it's validation code for the subnet mask in
>> >>> particular, but the whole IP address/netmask/gateway validation
>> >>> section is rather unrealiable it seems!
>> >>>
>> >>> Peter Grant
>> >>>
>> >>> "When you have a Swiss Army knife of a mind, everything looks like it
>> >>> should be dismantled." Danny O'Brien/Merlin Mann
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Watford mailing list
>> >>> Watford at mailman.lug.org.uk
>> >>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/watford
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Watford mailing list
>> >> Watford at mailman.lug.org.uk
>> >> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/watford
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Watford mailing list
>> > Watford at mailman.lug.org.uk
>> > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/watford
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Watford mailing list
>> Watford at mailman.lug.org.uk
>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/watford
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Watford mailing list
> Watford at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/watford
>