[Wolves] GPL Terms

[Dan]

steve parkes wrote:
>> From: Peter Oliver <p.d.oliver@mavit.freeserve.co.uk>
>> Subject: Re: [Wolves] GPL Terms
>> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 20:21:11 +0100 (BST)
>>
>> On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Simon Gill wrote:
>>
>>
>> > 1) Unless you have made significant modifications to the software you
>> > may not redistribute it.
>>
>> How do you define significant?  Also, do you wish to include the case
>> where the code is unmodified?
> 
> 
> The problem with this is everyone that wants to use free code and then 
> make it non-free would say thier contribution has been significant.
> 

I have a question:  How do Lindows do it?

Do they just ignore the GPL or what?

-- 
Dan