[Wolves] Linux firewall in 16MB ?
Andy Wootton
andy.wootton at wyrley.demon.co.uk
Tue Jan 4 23:45:04 GMT 2005
I have a choice of two highly desirable antique PCs to use as a
firewall. One is a a 486/66 and one a P133. The P133 has 16MB of memory
and the 486 40MB. Either would have done the job a year ago.
I want to use a distro that is still being security patched but nothing
seems to run in less than 64MB any more. I've tried an Ubuntu "custom"
install (starts to install with 40MB then randomly hangs after a few
hours of hard labour - without giving me any chance to enable the swap
file). I read the spec. of Fedora (64MB for a text install!) and
Smoothwall. The new Debian installer booted off floppies won't even run
in 16MB.
In desperation I tried OpenBSD as a colleague has been suggesting for
about a year. It seems to work fine in 16MB once you get past being
dumped at the command line to partition your disk using a BSD jargon
dialect. So well in fact that I'm thinking of having a go at getting a
workstation running on the 40MB box. I don't like throwing stuff away.
Before I put in any more effort learning a new flavour of Unix, can
anyone suggest a sensible Linux config. or tell any reason why OpenBSD
would be a bad choice? I'm not ready to try Gentoo on a PC with a BIOS
that won't boot off a CD. I've already spent about 3 days on this. I
have a nice collection of boot floppies for my troubles though.
Woo
More information about the Wolves
mailing list