[Wolves] Free to good home.

[Mark Croft]

i know what you mean with the interface , i did quite like the window
3.1 desktop it felt familar cos i had an atari GEM machine at home and
the look and feel was very much a gem clone i thought.
Windows NT 3.51 was such a big improvement over trying to get windows
3.1 too work on a network and getting it too see shared printers on
the novel network etc etc

Also it was quantum leap for programming in compared toodoing DOS
command line compiling. I even got the debugger too step through code
as autocad was running in the background , made bug fixing loads
easier.



2009/12/6 Stephen Parkes <sparkes at westmids.biz>:
> 2009/12/6 Mark Croft <croftyboy at googlemail.com>:
>> i remember using NT 3.5 on pentium 100 i think it was.
>>
>
> I didn't like NT 3.5 as it was old before it's time after 18 months of
> 'Chicago' interface leaks looking at the windows 3.1 interface made NT
> look like a step backwards even if it was a million times better for
> corporate users.
>
> sparkes
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wolves LUG mailing list
> Homepage: http://www.wolveslug.org.uk/
> Mailing list: Wolves at mailman.lug.org.uk
> Mailing list home: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/wolves
>