[Wylug-discuss] Webtraffiker

[James Holden]

--
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 07:48, Alan J. Wylie wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:32:51 +0000, James Holden <wylug at jamesholden.net> said:
>
> > -- Anyone heard of these people? They're a 'SEO' company.
>
> > www.webtrafficker.uk.com
>
> 1) A google search for "webtrafficker" doesn't return their own web
>    site as number 1 hit.

That's quite hilarious.

> 2) .uk.com? the .com and .co.uk sites both end up at cyber-squatting
>    holding pages. Couldn't they have chosen a name that wasn't already
>    registered?

Their name reminds me of other types of traffickers, so it wasn't such a
good choice anyway!

> 3) No mention at all on google groups, which might be a good thing -
>    at least no spam from them has been reported in nanas.

Strange that. It looks like they're not well known in the industry.

James


> --
> Alan J. Wylie                                          http://www.wylie.me.uk/
> "Perfection [in design] is achieved not when there is nothing left to add,
> but rather when there is nothing left to take away."
>   -- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wylug-discuss mailing list
> Wylug-discuss at wylug.org.uk
> http://list.wylug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/wylug-discuss
--
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[ signature.asc of type application/pgp-signature deleted ]
--