[Wylug-discuss] Mail Clients (fwd)
Jim Jackson
jj at franjam.org.uk
Sat Feb 4 23:32:17 GMT 2006
There are some bad delays somewhere on the wylug lists. I've noticed
delays this week. I sent this over 7 hours ago and I still haven't seen it
on the lists. The other email I sent at about the same time got thru'
almost immediately.
Jim
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:29:01 +0000 (GMT)
From: Jim Jackson <jj at comp.leeds.ac.uk>
To: WYLUG discussion list <wylug-discuss at wylug.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Wylug-discuss] Mail Clients
still no mention of Pine :-( And I and John certainly post quite often
here.
Jim (sorry for top-posting)
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> I've just knocked up a script to identify mail client used and let it
> loose on around 6-8 months of wylug archives. Here are my results:-
>
> Mail client Messages Users Msg/User
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~
> Thunderbird 134 34 3.9
> Mutt 226 24 9.4
> Evolution 149 22 6.8
> KMail 285 19 15.0
> Outlook 28 16 1.8
> SquirrelMail 7 5 1.4
> IMP 15 4 3.8
> Eudora 6 4 1.5
> Sylpheed 15 3 5.0
> Internet Mail Service 14 3 4.7
> Gnus 13 3 4.3
> Lotus Notes 7 3 2.3
> Apple Mail 4 3 1.3
> WorldClient 8 2 4.0
> Open WebMail 4 2 2.0
> slrn 24 1 24.0
> WWW-Mail 5 1 5.0
> Navaho Galium 5 1 5.0
> MIME::Lite 2 1 2.0
> LycosMail 1 1 1.0
> Pegasus 1 1 1.0
> GroupWise 1 1 1.0
>
> Total 954 154
>
>
> which shows that the KMail people are particularly prolific (although
> the one slrn user really shows what prolific means....). Shame about
> Outlook.
>
> Nigel.
>
> --
> [ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham at InTechnology.co.uk ]
> [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wylug-discuss mailing list
> Wylug-discuss at wylug.org.uk
> http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/wylug-discuss
>
More information about the Wylug-discuss
mailing list