[Wylug-discuss] List Etiquette: Top Posting vs. Bottom Posting
Dave Fisher
wylug-discuss at davefisher.co.uk
Sun Oct 28 15:11:19 GMT 2007
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 02:28:47PM +0000, Roger Beaumont wrote:
> Can I summarise what I think I've taken from this?
>
> 1. Top vs. bottom vs. in-line seems to be a matter of different personal
> preference - often passionately held.
I don't think that is an accurate summary.
From what I've read so far, top-posting advocates have a greater
propensity to consider it a personal preference, whereas bottom-posting
advocates are more inclined to see objective usability problems which
need colective solutions. N.B. I'm not suggesting for a moment that
either group is homogeneous or exclusive.
Sounds more like libertarian vs. communitarian bunfight to me, than a
problem solving colloquium for engineers ;-)
> It seems to me that a universal consensus on this is unlikely to be
> achievable.
Yes, but I'd very much prefer less-than-universal consensus, or
widespread aqcuiescence, to no convention at all.
> 2. An almost universally shared position seems to be that it is bad
> etiquette to waste readers' time; by no matter what means, posters should
> minimise how long it takes to 'cut to the chase'.
>
> I don't think it would be hard to agree on that being the underlying aim.
Agreed.
> And IMHO, if we succeed with point 2, point 1 probably doesn't matter too
> much.
I really don't think so.
Even with well snipped, and sensibly interleaved threads, the
requirement to toggle between top-posting and bottom-posting modes on a
regular basis is an uneccessary and painful burden.
Dave
More information about the Wylug-discuss
mailing list