[Wylug-discuss] Linux authentication against Windows active
directory
Nigel Metheringham
nigel.metheringham at dev.intechnology.co.uk
Mon Apr 21 12:25:40 BST 2008
On 21 Apr 2008, at 12:14, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
>
>> However, I have found that doing the first sets of steps WITHOUT
>> joining
>> the AD domain works fine for authentication etc, ie:-
>> - Set Kerboros up to look at the AD servers
>> - Set LDAP up to grab account data from the AD servers
>> - Set PAM to auth against Kerboros, and get account info from LDAP
> Yes, that's what I've done. Does you AD allow anonymous querying, or
> are you using a lookup account in the ldap.conf? Or something else?
I'm using a lookup account - an AD account defined as a Domain Guest.
For these experiments it should be stated that I'm using a brand new
pair of AD 2003 R2 servers working in an example.com subdomain, so its a
very simple proof of concept test configuration with minimal data
within.
>> At this point, without installing samba, and without joining an AD
>> domain, I can now authenticate quite happily against the AD system.
>
> Yes. It's all down to the way kerberos works. Which is also why
> the fqdn
> needs to be right if you join a domain. If your domain is big, and
> setup in a
> less than ideal way, the performance of out of the box nss_ldap vs
> winbind can
> be quite poor, to the point of being problematic.
As in winbind would be giving better performance. Have you any pointers
as to where I could learn more about this?
[snip]
>> It should be noted that in this particular case, I have no need or
>> desire for the abilities to:-
>> - Change the AD passwords from the linux boxes
> Doesn't that work already with your setup?
It might - its explicitly something we don't care about at present, so
I haven't tested :-)
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham at InTechnology.com ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
More information about the Wylug-discuss
mailing list