[Wylug-help] Video Encoding/Transcoding Hardware
John Hodrien
johnh at comp.leeds.ac.uk
Sun Dec 18 18:34:21 GMT 2005
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Mostly, the problem is the time required on fairly basic consumer PCs,
> but I am also experiencing occasional errors.
> I'm not entirely sure whether the errors are only ocurring when
> decoding for display, but one thing is undoubtedly clear: my current kit
> doesn't have the umph I would like.
Burn it to a DVD and play it on a consumer player to make sure that's it's an
encoding problem (but I'd bet my money at that end).
> Would there be much merit in investigating dedicated hardware encoders?
I'm not sure, I don't have experience with them I'm afraid.
> If so, do you have any recommendations?
>
> What sort of system/components should I be looking at to hit a plausible
> price/performance sweetspot for video encoding (I doubt if I can afford
> the kind of kit that professional studios use)?
> Multi-processor boards? Dual Core processors? 64-Bit? A cluster of
> less powerful (but cheaper) boxes? Disk speeds/types? Buses/bandwidth?
> Memory types/sizes.
The only time I've done any video encoding I found my Dual channel DDR 400 AMD
2700+ was entirely CPU limited. Clustering is a good option if you've got
spare machines already, but I guess is highly dependent on what software
you're using. If you're talking multiple processing cores, I can tell you
that the AMD dual core chips are absolute belters, but do come with a price
tag to match.
Take a look at tomshardware and look for their CPU review for what you've
already got, and compare it with the more recent stuff:
http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/08/01/dual/page10.html
jh
--
"I gave my life for freedom - this I know:
For those who bade me fight had told me so." -- William Norman Ewer
More information about the Wylug-help
mailing list