[cumbria_lug] Meeting on Friday

[Michael Saunders]

On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Russ wrote:
>
> ones. Does anyone have any other ideas? It'll be a low-end box, and
> we were thinking of using fvwm95 as the window manager, since it's
> lightweight and will look familiar.

Might be better going for IceWM. Fvwm95 is comparatively old and
clunky, and is slightly heavier than IceWM in its default setup. IceWM
(1.0.4 in particular) is very compact and speedy, and works almost
identically to Win9x.

M

-- 
Michael Saunders
www.aster.fsnet.co.uk