[Beds] Re: Thank you

[David Pashley]

=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 24 January 2003 09:30, Jonathan Dye wrote:
> Neil Darlow wrote:
> > Hi Jon,
> >
> > On Thursday 23 Jan 2003 15:25, Jonathan Dye wrote:
> >> Looks OK to me (gpg v1.0.6)
> >
> > I'm using gnupg-1.2.1 and it showed as bad for me too. Did the hash
> > change between gnupg-1.0.x and gnupg-1.2.x?
>
> Hmm, looking at the docs for v1.0.6 it talks about a few incompatabilities
> with older versions (that are fixed with command line switches), I wonder
> if similiar things have happened between 1.0.6 and 1.2.x.  I'll have a lo=
ok
> at the docs for 1.2.x when I get home.
>
> Although after trying it again with --verbose I get:
> > [jon@firewall jon]$ gpg --verbose --verify email
> > gpg: Warning: using insecure memory!
> > gpg: armor header: Version: Hush 2.2 (Java)
> > gpg: armor header: Note: This signature can be verified at
>
> https://www.hushtools.com/verify
>
> > gpg: original file name=3D''
> > gpg: Signature made Thu 23 Jan 2003 01:46:21 PM GMT using DSA key ID
>
> 15490DF9
>
> > gpg: requesting key 15490DF9 from wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net ...
> > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> > gpg: Total number processed: 0
> > gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
>
> So maybe it's not checking the signiture at all because I haven't got the
> correct key.  Should pay more attention next time.
>
> I can't get your key from anywhere Fred have you got a link to it?
>
> JD
>
Well normally if I don't have the key, I get a message saying something lik=
e=20
unable to verify. However the mail from Fred said Bad signature. Oh and I'm=
=20
unable to find a copy of the key.

=2D --=20
David Pashley
david@davidpashley.com
Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+MYooYsCKa6wDNXYRAkH2AJ0THKuGnrEn+urwk1tLkP1eg+UWAACffJBb
qsXZExHm+e66ATVr/pJklLU=3D
=3Dc8MK
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----