[Chester LUG] ccna etc
Nev
nev at nevstah.co.uk
Tue Nov 2 14:28:50 UTC 2010
hi mike
thanks for the welcome
sorry for the slow reply. was on the ccna course all last week in
manchester, manic to say the least!
i just need to practise so i can take the exam now!!
i've not heard of train signal before! i got a bunch of videos from the
folks i trained with, maybe a swap would be in order!
ta
nev
On 23/10/10 11:26, Michael Crilly wrote:
> Hi Nev,
>
> Welcome to the list :)
>
> I'm self studying a large majority of the course and if I feel
> confident, go for the exams. If not, I'm going to do a five day crash
> course with a lot of the material already covered.
>
> If you fancy getting together, I can give you a copy of the Train
> Signal videos I have which are decent :)
>
> Let me know mate.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike.
>
> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:55, Nev <nev at nevstah.co.uk
> <mailto:nev at nevstah.co.uk>> wrote:
>
>> hi mike
>>
>> where are you doing ccna? and hows it going? I'm starting tomorrow!
>>
>> nev
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:03, Michael Crilly <mrcrilly at googlemail.com
>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hit it with a stick.
>>>
>>> I need to sit down with you Stuart an pick your brains on networking
>>> fundamentals. I'm doing my CCNA at present.
>>>
>>> Besides we aint seen each other for some time now :)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Mike.
>>>
>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 09:50, Stuart Burns <stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I agre but the problem is how do I tell it which gateway is
>>>> default, ie the WAN:)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 23 October 2010 07:33, Michael Crilly <mrcrilly at googlemail.com
>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Isn't that done via the gateway IP you supply to each host?
>>>> Usually a router/switch that gets a packet/frame not in it's
>>>> own subnet will forward to the gateway no?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Mike.
>>>>
>>>> On 22 Oct 2010, at 23:22, Stuart Burns
>>>> <stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hiya,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is anyone really good with pfsense.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a small pc to function as a pfsense router.
>>>>>
>>>>> It has 3 interfaces - LAN,WAN,OPT
>>>>>
>>>>> The LAN is *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt
>>>>> from "10.0.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner warning: numerical
>>>>> links are often malicious: 10.0.0.0/16** <http://10.0.0.0/16>***
>>>>>
>>>>> WAN is provided by DHCP
>>>>>
>>>>> The last interface is *MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>> fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>**MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>> fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>***MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>> fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner
>>>>> warning: numerical links are often malicious: 172.16.0.0/24**
>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>***
>>>>>
>>>>> Now I can get all the routes talking to each other. However I
>>>>> cant get the 172.16.0.0 to use a default route to push it out
>>>>> the DHCP assigned WAN interface. I cant see anywhere to say
>>>>> any traffic with no explicit route, route via WAN.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone know if its even possible ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Stuart
>>>>>
>>>>> ***
>>>> ***
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>> ***
>>>> ***
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>
>>>> ***
>>>>
>>>> ***
>>>> ***
>>> ***
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> dangerous content by ***MailScanner*
>>> <http://www.mailscanner.info/>**, and is
>>> believed to be clean. ***
>> **
>>> *_______________________________________________**
>>> Chester mailing list
>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>> *
>> *
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by **MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>*,
>> and is
>> believed to be clean. ***
>> **_______________________________________________****
>> Chester mailing list
>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>> **
> **
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. **
> **
> **
>
> **
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> **
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the Chester
mailing list