[Chester LUG] ccna etc
Thomas Prophett
thomas at thomasprophett.co.uk
Tue Nov 2 14:34:41 UTC 2010
Nev
Who did you do the ccna course with?
Thomas.
On 2 November 2010 14:28, Nev <nev at nevstah.co.uk> wrote:
> hi mike
>
> thanks for the welcome
>
> sorry for the slow reply. was on the ccna course all last week in
> manchester, manic to say the least!
> i just need to practise so i can take the exam now!!
>
> i've not heard of train signal before! i got a bunch of videos from the
> folks i trained with, maybe a swap would be in order!
>
> ta
>
> nev
>
>
> On 23/10/10 11:26, Michael Crilly wrote:
>>
>> Hi Nev,
>>
>> Welcome to the list :)
>>
>> I'm self studying a large majority of the course and if I feel confident,
>> go for the exams. If not, I'm going to do a five day crash course with a lot
>> of the material already covered.
>>
>> If you fancy getting together, I can give you a copy of the Train Signal
>> videos I have which are decent :)
>>
>> Let me know mate.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Mike.
>>
>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:55, Nev <nev at nevstah.co.uk
>> <mailto:nev at nevstah.co.uk>> wrote:
>>
>>> hi mike
>>>
>>> where are you doing ccna? and hows it going? I'm starting tomorrow!
>>>
>>> nev
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:03, Michael Crilly <mrcrilly at googlemail.com
>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hit it with a stick.
>>>>
>>>> I need to sit down with you Stuart an pick your brains on networking
>>>> fundamentals. I'm doing my CCNA at present.
>>>>
>>>> Besides we aint seen each other for some time now :)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Mike.
>>>>
>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 09:50, Stuart Burns <stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I agre but the problem is how do I tell it which gateway is default, ie
>>>>> the WAN:)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23 October 2010 07:33, Michael Crilly <mrcrilly at googlemail.com
>>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't that done via the gateway IP you supply to each host?
>>>>> Usually a router/switch that gets a packet/frame not in it's
>>>>> own subnet will forward to the gateway no?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 22 Oct 2010, at 23:22, Stuart Burns
>>>>> <stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
>>>>> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hiya,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is anyone really good with pfsense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a small pc to function as a pfsense router.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It has 3 interfaces - LAN,WAN,OPT
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The LAN is *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt
>>>>>> from "10.0.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner warning: numerical
>>>>>> links are often malicious: 10.0.0.0/16** <http://10.0.0.0/16>***
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WAN is provided by DHCP
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The last interface is *MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>> fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
>>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>**MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>> fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
>>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>***MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>> fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner
>>>>>> warning: numerical links are often malicious: 172.16.0.0/24**
>>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>***
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now I can get all the routes talking to each other. However I
>>>>>> cant get the 172.16.0.0 to use a default route to push it out
>>>>>> the DHCP assigned WAN interface. I cant see anywhere to say
>>>>>> any traffic with no explicit route, route via WAN.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone know if its even possible ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stuart
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ***
>>>>>
>>>>> ***
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>
>>>>> ***
>>>>> ***
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>
>>>>> ***
>>>>>
>>>>> ***
>>>>> ***
>>>>
>>>> ***
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>> dangerous content by ***MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>**,
>>>> and is
>>>> believed to be clean. ***
>>>
>>> **
>>>>
>>>> *_______________________________________________**
>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>> *
>>>
>>> *
>>> --
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> dangerous content by **MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>*, and
>>> is
>>> believed to be clean. ***
>>> **_______________________________________________****
>>> Chester mailing list
>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>> **
>>
>> **
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
>> believed to be clean. **
>> **
>> **
>>
>> **
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chester mailing list
>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>> **
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>
More information about the Chester
mailing list