[Chester LUG] ccna etc
Michael Crilly
mrcrilly at googlemail.com
Tue Nov 2 14:38:58 UTC 2010
Good stuff Nev.
I don't think I will do a course. I have a CCNA kit at home, so I'm confident I can self study it all.
If I had a car, I would suggest lugging the kit somewhere we can meet up at so we can both mess around with it, but I don't have that luxury.
I would be up for a meet up with you and Thomas to swap resources. I have a CCNA set of books too which have Cisco videos on.
Let me know.
Regards,
Mike.
On 2 Nov 2010, at 14:34, Thomas Prophett <thomas at thomasprophett.co.uk> wrote:
> Nev
>
> Who did you do the ccna course with?
>
> Thomas.
>
> On 2 November 2010 14:28, Nev <nev at nevstah.co.uk> wrote:
>> hi mike
>>
>> thanks for the welcome
>>
>> sorry for the slow reply. was on the ccna course all last week in
>> manchester, manic to say the least!
>> i just need to practise so i can take the exam now!!
>>
>> i've not heard of train signal before! i got a bunch of videos from the
>> folks i trained with, maybe a swap would be in order!
>>
>> ta
>>
>> nev
>>
>>
>> On 23/10/10 11:26, Michael Crilly wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Nev,
>>>
>>> Welcome to the list :)
>>>
>>> I'm self studying a large majority of the course and if I feel confident,
>>> go for the exams. If not, I'm going to do a five day crash course with a lot
>>> of the material already covered.
>>>
>>> If you fancy getting together, I can give you a copy of the Train Signal
>>> videos I have which are decent :)
>>>
>>> Let me know mate.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Mike.
>>>
>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:55, Nev <nev at nevstah.co.uk
>>> <mailto:nev at nevstah.co.uk>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> hi mike
>>>>
>>>> where are you doing ccna? and hows it going? I'm starting tomorrow!
>>>>
>>>> nev
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:03, Michael Crilly <mrcrilly at googlemail.com
>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hit it with a stick.
>>>>>
>>>>> I need to sit down with you Stuart an pick your brains on networking
>>>>> fundamentals. I'm doing my CCNA at present.
>>>>>
>>>>> Besides we aint seen each other for some time now :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 09:50, Stuart Burns <stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
>>>>> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I agre but the problem is how do I tell it which gateway is default, ie
>>>>>> the WAN:)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23 October 2010 07:33, Michael Crilly <mrcrilly at googlemail.com
>>>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Isn't that done via the gateway IP you supply to each host?
>>>>>> Usually a router/switch that gets a packet/frame not in it's
>>>>>> own subnet will forward to the gateway no?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 22 Oct 2010, at 23:22, Stuart Burns
>>>>>> <stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
>>>>>> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hiya,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is anyone really good with pfsense.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a small pc to function as a pfsense router.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It has 3 interfaces - LAN,WAN,OPT
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The LAN is *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt
>>>>>>> from "10.0.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner warning: numerical
>>>>>>> links are often malicious: 10.0.0.0/16** <http://10.0.0.0/16>***
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WAN is provided by DHCP
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The last interface is *MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>>> fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
>>>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>**MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>>> fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
>>>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>***MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>>> fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner
>>>>>>> warning: numerical links are often malicious: 172.16.0.0/24**
>>>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>***
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now I can get all the routes talking to each other. However I
>>>>>>> cant get the 172.16.0.0 to use a default route to push it out
>>>>>>> the DHCP assigned WAN interface. I cant see anywhere to say
>>>>>>> any traffic with no explicit route, route via WAN.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyone know if its even possible ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stuart
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ***
>>>>>> ***
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ***
>>>>>> ***
>>>>>
>>>>> ***
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>>> dangerous content by ***MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>**,
>>>>> and is
>>>>> believed to be clean. ***
>>>>
>>>> **
>>>>>
>>>>> *_______________________________________________**
>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>> *
>>>>
>>>> *
>>>> --
>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>> dangerous content by **MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>*, and
>>>> is
>>>> believed to be clean. ***
>>>> **_______________________________________________****
>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>> **
>>>
>>> **
>>> --
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
>>> believed to be clean. **
>>> **
>>> **
>>>
>>> **
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Chester mailing list
>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>> **
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chester mailing list
>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
More information about the Chester
mailing list