[Chester LUG] ccna etc

Nev nev at nevstah.co.uk
Tue Nov 2 20:04:22 UTC 2010


hiya

i did mine with commsupport and was really pleased with it all.. just 
need to practise lots till i'm ready for the exam!!

i work in nantwich and also drive! i dont have any of the kit tho. i'm 
sure we could all get together and help each other pass!

ta

nev

On 02/11/2010 14:38, Michael Crilly wrote:
> Good stuff Nev.
>
> I don't think I will do a course. I have a CCNA kit at home, so I'm confident I can self study it all.
>
> If I had a car, I would suggest lugging the kit somewhere we can meet up at so we can both mess around with it, but I don't have that luxury.
>
> I would be up for a meet up with you and Thomas to swap resources. I have a CCNA set of books too which have Cisco videos on.
>
> Let me know.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike.
>
> On 2 Nov 2010, at 14:34, Thomas Prophett<thomas at thomasprophett.co.uk>  wrote:
>
>> Nev
>>
>> Who did you do the ccna course with?
>>
>> Thomas.
>>
>> On 2 November 2010 14:28, Nev<nev at nevstah.co.uk>  wrote:
>>> hi mike
>>>
>>> thanks for the welcome
>>>
>>> sorry for the slow reply. was on the ccna course all last week in
>>> manchester, manic to say the least!
>>> i just need to practise so i can take the exam now!!
>>>
>>> i've not heard of train signal before! i got a bunch of videos from the
>>> folks i trained with, maybe a swap would be in order!
>>>
>>> ta
>>>
>>> nev
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23/10/10 11:26, Michael Crilly wrote:
>>>> Hi Nev,
>>>>
>>>> Welcome to the list :)
>>>>
>>>> I'm self studying a large majority of the course and if I feel confident,
>>>> go for the exams. If not, I'm going to do a five day crash course with a lot
>>>> of the material already covered.
>>>>
>>>> If you fancy getting together, I can give you a copy of the Train Signal
>>>> videos I have which are decent :)
>>>>
>>>> Let me know mate.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Mike.
>>>>
>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:55, Nev<nev at nevstah.co.uk
>>>> <mailto:nev at nevstah.co.uk>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> hi mike
>>>>>
>>>>> where are you doing ccna? and hows it going? I'm starting tomorrow!
>>>>>
>>>>> nev
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:03, Michael Crilly<mrcrilly at googlemail.com
>>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hit it with a stick.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I need to sit down with you Stuart an pick your brains on networking
>>>>>> fundamentals. I'm doing my CCNA at present.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Besides we aint seen each other for some time now :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 09:50, Stuart Burns<stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
>>>>>> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I agre but the problem is how do I tell it which gateway is default, ie
>>>>>>> the WAN:)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 23 October 2010 07:33, Michael Crilly<mrcrilly at googlemail.com
>>>>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Isn't that done via the gateway IP you supply to each host?
>>>>>>>     Usually a router/switch that gets a packet/frame not in it's
>>>>>>>     own subnet will forward to the gateway no?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Mike.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     On 22 Oct 2010, at 23:22, Stuart Burns
>>>>>>>     <stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
>>>>>>>     <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Hiya,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Is anyone really good with pfsense.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     I have a small pc to function as a pfsense router.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     It has 3 interfaces - LAN,WAN,OPT
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     The LAN is *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt
>>>>>>>>     from "10.0.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner warning: numerical
>>>>>>>>     links are often malicious: 10.0.0.0/16**<http://10.0.0.0/16>***
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     WAN is provided by DHCP
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     The last interface is *MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>>>>     fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
>>>>>>>>     <http://172.16.0.0/24>**MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>>>>     fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
>>>>>>>>     <http://172.16.0.0/24>***MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>>>>     fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner
>>>>>>>>     warning: numerical links are often malicious: 172.16.0.0/24**
>>>>>>>>     <http://172.16.0.0/24>***
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Now I can get all the routes talking to each other. However I
>>>>>>>>     cant get the 172.16.0.0 to use  a default route to push it out
>>>>>>>>     the DHCP assigned WAN interface. I cant see anywhere to say
>>>>>>>>     any traffic with no explicit route, route via WAN.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Anyone know if its even possible ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Stuart
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     ***
>>>>>>>     ***
>>>>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>     Chester mailing list
>>>>>>>>     Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>>>     https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>>>     ***
>>>>>>>     ***
>>>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>     Chester mailing list
>>>>>>>     Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>>     https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     ***
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>>>> dangerous content by ***MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>**,
>>>>>> and is
>>>>>> believed to be clean. ***
>>>>> **
>>>>>> *_______________________________________________**
>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>> *
>>>>> *
>>>>> --
>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>>> dangerous content by **MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>*, and
>>>>> is
>>>>> believed to be clean. ***
>>>>> **_______________________________________________****
>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>> **
>>>> **
>>>> --
>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
>>>> believed to be clean. **
>>>> **
>>>> **
>>>>
>>>> **
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>> **
>>> --
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>>> believed to be clean.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Chester mailing list
>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chester mailing list
>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.





More information about the Chester mailing list