[Chester LUG] ccna etc

Tue Nov 2 20:29:35 UTC 2010

If anyone is interested, I am (trying) to run the networking course again
before end of Jan. Taught by a pro lecturer. It's a basics and intermediate
day long hands on.

Cost would be less than £100 each. Would prolly need 7 people or so.

Just putting it out there.

Stu

On 2 November 2010 20:04, Nev <nev at nevstah.co.uk> wrote:

> hiya
>
> i did mine with commsupport and was really pleased with it all.. just need
> to practise lots till i'm ready for the exam!!
>
> i work in nantwich and also drive! i dont have any of the kit tho. i'm sure
> we could all get together and help each other pass!
>
> ta
>
> nev
>
>
> On 02/11/2010 14:38, Michael Crilly wrote:
>
>> Good stuff Nev.
>>
>> I don't think I will do a course. I have a CCNA kit at home, so I'm
>> confident I can self study it all.
>>
>> If I had a car, I would suggest lugging the kit somewhere we can meet up
>> at so we can both mess around with it, but I don't have that luxury.
>>
>> I would be up for a meet up with you and Thomas to swap resources. I have
>> a CCNA set of books too which have Cisco videos on.
>>
>> Let me know.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Mike.
>>
>> On 2 Nov 2010, at 14:34, Thomas Prophett<thomas at thomasprophett.co.uk>
>>  wrote:
>>
>>  Nev
>>>
>>> Who did you do the ccna course with?
>>>
>>> Thomas.
>>>
>>> On 2 November 2010 14:28, Nev<nev at nevstah.co.uk>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> hi mike
>>>>
>>>> thanks for the welcome
>>>>
>>>> sorry for the slow reply. was on the ccna course all last week in
>>>> manchester, manic to say the least!
>>>> i just need to practise so i can take the exam now!!
>>>>
>>>> i've not heard of train signal before! i got a bunch of videos from the
>>>> folks i trained with, maybe a swap would be in order!
>>>>
>>>> ta
>>>>
>>>> nev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 23/10/10 11:26, Michael Crilly wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Nev,
>>>>>
>>>>> Welcome to the list :)
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm self studying a large majority of the course and if I feel
>>>>> confident,
>>>>> go for the exams. If not, I'm going to do a five day crash course with
>>>>> a lot
>>>>> of the material already covered.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you fancy getting together, I can give you a copy of the Train
>>>>> Signal
>>>>> videos I have which are decent :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me know mate.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:55, Nev<nev at nevstah.co.uk
>>>>> <mailto:nev at nevstah.co.uk>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  hi mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>> where are you doing ccna? and hows it going? I'm starting tomorrow!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> nev
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:03, Michael Crilly<mrcrilly at googlemail.com
>>>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Hit it with a stick.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I need to sit down with you Stuart an pick your brains on networking
>>>>>>> fundamentals. I'm doing my CCNA at present.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Besides we aint seen each other for some time now :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 09:50, Stuart Burns<stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
>>>>>>> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  I agre but the problem is how do I tell it which gateway is default,
>>>>>>>> ie
>>>>>>>> the WAN:)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 23 October 2010 07:33, Michael Crilly<mrcrilly at googlemail.com
>>>>>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    Isn't that done via the gateway IP you supply to each host?
>>>>>>>>    Usually a router/switch that gets a packet/frame not in it's
>>>>>>>>    own subnet will forward to the gateway no?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    Mike.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    On 22 Oct 2010, at 23:22, Stuart Burns
>>>>>>>>    <stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
>>>>>>>>    <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Hiya,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    Is anyone really good with pfsense.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    I have a small pc to function as a pfsense router.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    It has 3 interfaces - LAN,WAN,OPT
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    The LAN is *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt
>>>>>>>>>    from "10.0.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner warning: numerical
>>>>>>>>>    links are often malicious: 10.0.0.0/16**<http://10.0.0.0/16>***
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    WAN is provided by DHCP
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    The last interface is *MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>>>>>    fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
>>>>>>>>>    <http://172.16.0.0/24>**MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>>>>>    fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
>>>>>>>>>    <http://172.16.0.0/24>***MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>>>>>    fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner
>>>>>>>>>    warning: numerical links are often malicious: 172.16.0.0/24**
>>>>>>>>>    <http://172.16.0.0/24>***
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    Now I can get all the routes talking to each other. However I
>>>>>>>>>    cant get the 172.16.0.0 to use  a default route to push it out
>>>>>>>>>    the DHCP assigned WAN interface. I cant see anywhere to say
>>>>>>>>>    any traffic with no explicit route, route via WAN.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    Anyone know if its even possible ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    Regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    Stuart
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    ***
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    ***
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>    Chester mailing list
>>>>>>>>>    Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>>>>    https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    ***
>>>>>>>>    ***
>>>>>>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>    Chester mailing list
>>>>>>>>    Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>>>    https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    ***
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>>>>> dangerous content by ***MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/
>>>>>>> >**,
>>>>>>> and is
>>>>>>> believed to be clean. ***
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> **
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *_______________________________________________**
>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> *
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>>>> dangerous content by **MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>*,
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> believed to be clean. ***
>>>>>> **_______________________________________________****
>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>> **
>>>>>>
>>>>> **
>>>>> --
>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>>>>> is
>>>>> believed to be clean. **
>>>>> **
>>>>> **
>>>>>
>>>>> **
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>> **
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>>>> believed to be clean.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> Chester mailing list
>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chester mailing list
>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>
>>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/chester/attachments/20101102/42a64557/attachment.html>