[Chester LUG] ccna etc
Les Pritchard
les.pritchard at gmail.com
Fri Nov 5 11:45:54 UTC 2010
Hi,
Just to say I'd be interested in a 'cisco day' if it can be arranged. I've
spoken to Thomas briefly about this, we could always use GNS3 if we can't
get physical kit to a location.
Les
On 4 November 2010 19:21, Michael Crilly <mrcrilly at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Stuart,
>
> I would think about it, but money is an issue really. I have other
> priorities and it currently costs me nothing to read books I bought a year
> ago and use kit bought equally as long ago.
>
> I'll keep it in mind though and please do let me know.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike
>
> On 2 Nov 2010, at 20:29, Stuart Burns wrote:
>
> If anyone is interested, I am (trying) to run the networking course again
> before end of Jan. Taught by a pro lecturer. It's a basics and intermediate
> day long hands on.
>
> Cost would be less than £100 each. Would prolly need 7 people or so.
>
> Just putting it out there.
>
> Stu
>
> On 2 November 2010 20:04, Nev <nev at nevstah.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> hiya
>>
>> i did mine with commsupport and was really pleased with it all.. just need
>> to practise lots till i'm ready for the exam!!
>>
>> i work in nantwich and also drive! i dont have any of the kit tho. i'm
>> sure we could all get together and help each other pass!
>>
>> ta
>>
>> nev
>>
>>
>> On 02/11/2010 14:38, Michael Crilly wrote:
>>
>>> Good stuff Nev.
>>>
>>> I don't think I will do a course. I have a CCNA kit at home, so I'm
>>> confident I can self study it all.
>>>
>>> If I had a car, I would suggest lugging the kit somewhere we can meet up
>>> at so we can both mess around with it, but I don't have that luxury.
>>>
>>> I would be up for a meet up with you and Thomas to swap resources. I have
>>> a CCNA set of books too which have Cisco videos on.
>>>
>>> Let me know.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Mike.
>>>
>>> On 2 Nov 2010, at 14:34, Thomas Prophett<thomas at thomasprophett.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nev
>>>>
>>>> Who did you do the ccna course with?
>>>>
>>>> Thomas.
>>>>
>>>> On 2 November 2010 14:28, Nev<nev at nevstah.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> hi mike
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for the welcome
>>>>>
>>>>> sorry for the slow reply. was on the ccna course all last week in
>>>>> manchester, manic to say the least!
>>>>> i just need to practise so i can take the exam now!!
>>>>>
>>>>> i've not heard of train signal before! i got a bunch of videos from the
>>>>> folks i trained with, maybe a swap would be in order!
>>>>>
>>>>> ta
>>>>>
>>>>> nev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23/10/10 11:26, Michael Crilly wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Nev,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Welcome to the list :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm self studying a large majority of the course and if I feel
>>>>>> confident,
>>>>>> go for the exams. If not, I'm going to do a five day crash course with
>>>>>> a lot
>>>>>> of the material already covered.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you fancy getting together, I can give you a copy of the Train
>>>>>> Signal
>>>>>> videos I have which are decent :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let me know mate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:55, Nev<nev at nevstah.co.uk
>>>>>> <mailto:nev at nevstah.co.uk>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> hi mike
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> where are you doing ccna? and hows it going? I'm starting tomorrow!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> nev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:03, Michael Crilly<mrcrilly at googlemail.com
>>>>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hit it with a stick.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I need to sit down with you Stuart an pick your brains on networking
>>>>>>>> fundamentals. I'm doing my CCNA at present.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Besides we aint seen each other for some time now :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 09:50, Stuart Burns<stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
>>>>>>>> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I agre but the problem is how do I tell it which gateway is
>>>>>>>>> default, ie
>>>>>>>>> the WAN:)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 23 October 2010 07:33, Michael Crilly<mrcrilly at googlemail.com
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Isn't that done via the gateway IP you supply to each host?
>>>>>>>>> Usually a router/switch that gets a packet/frame not in it's
>>>>>>>>> own subnet will forward to the gateway no?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 22 Oct 2010, at 23:22, Stuart Burns
>>>>>>>>> <stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hiya,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is anyone really good with pfsense.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have a small pc to function as a pfsense router.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It has 3 interfaces - LAN,WAN,OPT
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The LAN is *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt
>>>>>>>>>> from "10.0.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner warning: numerical
>>>>>>>>>> links are often malicious: 10.0.0.0/16**<http://10.0.0.0/16
>>>>>>>>>> >***
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> WAN is provided by DHCP
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The last interface is *MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>>>>>> fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
>>>>>>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>**MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>>>>>> fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
>>>>>>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>***MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>>>>>> fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner
>>>>>>>>>> warning: numerical links are often malicious: 172.16.0.0/24**
>>>>>>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>***
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Now I can get all the routes talking to each other. However I
>>>>>>>>>> cant get the 172.16.0.0 to use a default route to push it out
>>>>>>>>>> the DHCP assigned WAN interface. I cant see anywhere to say
>>>>>>>>>> any traffic with no explicit route, route via WAN.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anyone know if its even possible ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Stuart
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>>>>>> dangerous content by ***MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/
>>>>>>>> >**,
>>>>>>>> and is
>>>>>>>> believed to be clean. ***
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> **
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *_______________________________________________**
>>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>>>>> dangerous content by **MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>*,
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> believed to be clean. ***
>>>>>>> **_______________________________________________****
>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>>> **
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> **
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> believed to be clean. **
>>>>>> **
>>>>>> **
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>> **
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>>>>> believed to be clean.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Chester mailing list
>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chester mailing list
>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/chester/attachments/20101105/073318ca/attachment.html>
More information about the Chester
mailing list