[Chester LUG] ccna etc

Michael Crilly mrcrilly at googlemail.com
Thu Nov 4 19:21:31 UTC 2010


Hi Stuart,

I would think about it, but money is an issue really. I have other priorities and it currently costs me nothing to read books I bought a year ago and use kit bought equally as long ago.

I'll keep it in mind though and please do let me know.

Cheers,

Mike

On 2 Nov 2010, at 20:29, Stuart Burns wrote:

> If anyone is interested, I am (trying) to run the networking course again before end of Jan. Taught by a pro lecturer. It's a basics and intermediate day long hands on.
> 
> Cost would be less than £100 each. Would prolly need 7 people or so.
> 
> Just putting it out there.
> 
> Stu
> 
> On 2 November 2010 20:04, Nev <nev at nevstah.co.uk> wrote:
> hiya
> 
> i did mine with commsupport and was really pleased with it all.. just need to practise lots till i'm ready for the exam!!
> 
> i work in nantwich and also drive! i dont have any of the kit tho. i'm sure we could all get together and help each other pass!
> 
> ta
> 
> nev
> 
> 
> On 02/11/2010 14:38, Michael Crilly wrote:
> Good stuff Nev.
> 
> I don't think I will do a course. I have a CCNA kit at home, so I'm confident I can self study it all.
> 
> If I had a car, I would suggest lugging the kit somewhere we can meet up at so we can both mess around with it, but I don't have that luxury.
> 
> I would be up for a meet up with you and Thomas to swap resources. I have a CCNA set of books too which have Cisco videos on.
> 
> Let me know.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mike.
> 
> On 2 Nov 2010, at 14:34, Thomas Prophett<thomas at thomasprophett.co.uk>  wrote:
> 
> Nev
> 
> Who did you do the ccna course with?
> 
> Thomas.
> 
> On 2 November 2010 14:28, Nev<nev at nevstah.co.uk>  wrote:
> hi mike
> 
> thanks for the welcome
> 
> sorry for the slow reply. was on the ccna course all last week in
> manchester, manic to say the least!
> i just need to practise so i can take the exam now!!
> 
> i've not heard of train signal before! i got a bunch of videos from the
> folks i trained with, maybe a swap would be in order!
> 
> ta
> 
> nev
> 
> 
> On 23/10/10 11:26, Michael Crilly wrote:
> Hi Nev,
> 
> Welcome to the list :)
> 
> I'm self studying a large majority of the course and if I feel confident,
> go for the exams. If not, I'm going to do a five day crash course with a lot
> of the material already covered.
> 
> If you fancy getting together, I can give you a copy of the Train Signal
> videos I have which are decent :)
> 
> Let me know mate.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mike.
> 
> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:55, Nev<nev at nevstah.co.uk
> <mailto:nev at nevstah.co.uk>>  wrote:
> 
> hi mike
> 
> where are you doing ccna? and hows it going? I'm starting tomorrow!
> 
> nev
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:03, Michael Crilly<mrcrilly at googlemail.com
> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>>  wrote:
> 
> Hit it with a stick.
> 
> I need to sit down with you Stuart an pick your brains on networking
> fundamentals. I'm doing my CCNA at present.
> 
> Besides we aint seen each other for some time now :)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mike.
> 
> On 23 Oct 2010, at 09:50, Stuart Burns<stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>>  wrote:
> 
> I agre but the problem is how do I tell it which gateway is default, ie
> the WAN:)
> 
> 
> 
> On 23 October 2010 07:33, Michael Crilly<mrcrilly at googlemail.com
> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>>  wrote:
> 
>    Isn't that done via the gateway IP you supply to each host?
>    Usually a router/switch that gets a packet/frame not in it's
>    own subnet will forward to the gateway no?
> 
>    Regards,
> 
>    Mike.
> 
>    On 22 Oct 2010, at 23:22, Stuart Burns
>    <stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
>    <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>>  wrote:
> 
>    Hiya,
> 
>    Is anyone really good with pfsense.
> 
>    I have a small pc to function as a pfsense router.
> 
>    It has 3 interfaces - LAN,WAN,OPT
> 
>    The LAN is *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt
>    from "10.0.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner warning: numerical
>    links are often malicious: 10.0.0.0/16**<http://10.0.0.0/16>***
> 
>    WAN is provided by DHCP
> 
>    The last interface is *MailScanner has detected a possible
>    fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
>    <http://172.16.0.0/24>**MailScanner has detected a possible
>    fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
>    <http://172.16.0.0/24>***MailScanner has detected a possible
>    fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner
>    warning: numerical links are often malicious: 172.16.0.0/24**
>    <http://172.16.0.0/24>***
> 
>    Now I can get all the routes talking to each other. However I
>    cant get the 172.16.0.0 to use  a default route to push it out
>    the DHCP assigned WAN interface. I cant see anywhere to say
>    any traffic with no explicit route, route via WAN.
> 
>    Anyone know if its even possible ?
> 
>    Regards
> 
>    Stuart
> 
>    ***
>    ***
>    _______________________________________________
>    Chester mailing list
>    Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>    https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>    ***
>    ***
>    _______________________________________________
>    Chester mailing list
>    Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>    https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> 
>    ***
> 
> ***
> ***
> ***
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by ***MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>**,
> and is
> believed to be clean. ***
> **
> *_______________________________________________**
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> *
> *
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by **MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>*, and
> is
> believed to be clean. ***
> **_______________________________________________****
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> **
> **
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. **
> **
> **
> 
> **
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> **
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/chester/attachments/20101104/5484a7f9/attachment.html>


More information about the Chester mailing list