[Chester LUG] CCNA
Marcus Jones
marcus.jones.wxm at gmail.com
Tue Nov 16 10:08:12 UTC 2010
Hi Stephen,
We're usually the first Wednesday of the month, details are on the website
at:
www.wrexham-lug.org
(Shameless promotion over)!
Cheers
Marcus
On 16 November 2010 09:28, Stephen Jones <stephenjones at g-b-a.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Not a member of the Wrexham LUG yet! however will be soon somehow when on
> the Linx distro horse search for the right one to use, a few years back I
> ended up being a member of the chester LUG somehow.
>
> Where and when do the meets occur in Wrexham?.
>
> Regards
>
> Stephen
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: chester-bounces at mailman.lug.org.uk
> [mailto:chester-bounces at mailman.lug.org.uk] On Behalf Of
> chester-request at mailman.lug.org.uk
> Sent: 15 November 2010 12:00
> To: chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> Subject: Chester Digest, Vol 176, Issue 1
>
> Send Chester mailing list submissions to
> chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> chester-request at mailman.lug.org.uk
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> chester-owner at mailman.lug.org.uk
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Chester digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: CCNA (Ben Arnold)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:24:01 +0000
> From: Ben Arnold <benarnold at fsfe.org>
> Subject: Re: [Chester LUG] CCNA
> To: chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> Message-ID: <20101114182401.261bd3b9 at fsfe.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> Hi Stephen --
>
>
> Seems a bit quiet here, so I'll say welcome! Always good to have new
> lurkers, err, members :)
>
> I'm not into networking tremendously but I'll comment that a motto of
> mine for many things is that 'it's not what it costs but what it's
> worth' - especially with education and courses, even if they turn out
> rubbish, one still knows they're rubbish and what to go for next. As
> you say, it was all there without some of the usual hassle.
>
> Hope you can make a meet, though I may predict numbers may drop
> slightly over the next while! You say you passed your CCNA in Wrexham,
> are you on their list too? I'm due to go there instead of Liverpool,
> next month.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Ben
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:51:40 -0000, you (Stephen) wrote:
> | Hi Everyone,
> |
> | My name is Stephen, I have joined the LUG a while ago however
> | haven't attend contributed anything sorry to say. I recently passed
> | my CCNA via Yale in Wrexham however IT was over two year period
> | which cost me 350 pound per year. Bargin! However the trade off is a
> | long time commitment but on the plus I didn't have to make any
> | investment in equipment and then bundle it off on ebay afterwards.
> | They also offered believe until recently the Cisco Wireless course
> | too which was a doddle compare to the CCNA and only a year.
> | Regards
> |
> | Stephen
> |
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: chester-bounces at mailman.lug.org.uk
> | [mailto:chester-bounces at mailman.lug.org.uk] On Behalf Of
> | chester-request at mailman.lug.org.uk
> | Sent: 02 November 2010 20:30
> | To: chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> | Subject: Chester Digest, Vol 174, Issue 3
> |
> | Send Chester mailing list submissions to
> | chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> |
> | To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> | https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> | chester-request at mailman.lug.org.uk
> |
> | You can reach the person managing the list at
> | chester-owner at mailman.lug.org.uk
> |
> | When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> | than "Re: Contents of Chester digest..."
> |
> |
> | Today's Topics:
> |
> | 1. Re: ccna etc (Nev)
> | 2. Re: ccna etc (Stuart Burns)
> |
> |
> | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> |
> | Message: 1
> | Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 20:04:36 +0000
> | From: Nev <nev at nevstah.co.uk>
> | Subject: Re: [Chester LUG] ccna etc
> | To: chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> | Message-ID: <4CD06ED4.6030909 at nevstah.co.uk>
> | Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> |
> | hiya
> |
> | i did mine with commsupport and was really pleased with it all..
> | just need to practise lots till i'm ready for the exam!!
> |
> | i work in nantwich and also drive! i dont have any of the kit tho.
> | i'm sure we could all get together and help each other pass!
> |
> | ta
> |
> | nev
> |
> | On 02/11/2010 14:38, Michael Crilly wrote:
> | > Good stuff Nev.
> | >
> | > I don't think I will do a course. I have a CCNA kit at home, so I'm
> | confident I can self study it all.
> | >
> | > If I had a car, I would suggest lugging the kit somewhere we can
> | > meet up
> | at so we can both mess around with it, but I don't have that luxury.
> | >
> | > I would be up for a meet up with you and Thomas to swap resources.
> | > I have
> | a CCNA set of books too which have Cisco videos on.
> | >
> | > Let me know.
> | >
> | > Regards,
> | >
> | > Mike.
> | >
> | > On 2 Nov 2010, at 14:34, Thomas
> | > Prophett<thomas at thomasprophett.co.uk>
> | wrote:
> | >
> | >> Nev
> | >>
> | >> Who did you do the ccna course with?
> | >>
> | >> Thomas.
> | >>
> | >> On 2 November 2010 14:28, Nev<nev at nevstah.co.uk> wrote:
> | >>> hi mike
> | >>>
> | >>> thanks for the welcome
> | >>>
> | >>> sorry for the slow reply. was on the ccna course all last week
> | >>> in manchester, manic to say the least!
> | >>> i just need to practise so i can take the exam now!!
> | >>>
> | >>> i've not heard of train signal before! i got a bunch of videos
> | >>> from the folks i trained with, maybe a swap would be in order!
> | >>>
> | >>> ta
> | >>>
> | >>> nev
> | >>>
> | >>>
> | >>> On 23/10/10 11:26, Michael Crilly wrote:
> | >>>> Hi Nev,
> | >>>>
> | >>>> Welcome to the list :)
> | >>>>
> | >>>> I'm self studying a large majority of the course and if I feel
> | >>>> confident, go for the exams. If not, I'm going to do a five day
> | >>>> crash course with a lot of the material already covered.
> | >>>>
> | >>>> If you fancy getting together, I can give you a copy of the
> | >>>> Train Signal videos I have which are decent :)
> | >>>>
> | >>>> Let me know mate.
> | >>>>
> | >>>> Regards,
> | >>>>
> | >>>> Mike.
> | >>>>
> | >>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:55, Nev<nev at nevstah.co.uk
> | >>>> <mailto:nev at nevstah.co.uk>> wrote:
> | >>>>
> | >>>>> hi mike
> | >>>>>
> | >>>>> where are you doing ccna? and hows it going? I'm starting
> | >>>>> tomorrow!
> | >>>>>
> | >>>>> nev
> | >>>>>
> | >>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> | >>>>>
> | >>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:03, Michael
> | >>>>> Crilly<mrcrilly at googlemail.com
> | >>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>> wrote:
> | >>>>>
> | >>>>>> Hit it with a stick.
> | >>>>>>
> | >>>>>> I need to sit down with you Stuart an pick your brains on
> | >>>>>> networking fundamentals. I'm doing my CCNA at present.
> | >>>>>>
> | >>>>>> Besides we aint seen each other for some time now :)
> | >>>>>>
> | >>>>>> Regards,
> | >>>>>>
> | >>>>>> Mike.
> | >>>>>>
> | >>>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 09:50, Stuart
> | >>>>>> Burns<stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
> | >>>>>> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>> wrote:
> | >>>>>>
> | >>>>>>> I agre but the problem is how do I tell it which gateway is
> | >>>>>>> default, ie the WAN:)
> | >>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>> On 23 October 2010 07:33, Michael
> | >>>>>>> Crilly<mrcrilly at googlemail.com
> | >>>>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>> wrote:
> | >>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>> Isn't that done via the gateway IP you supply to each
> | >>>>>>> host? Usually a router/switch that gets a packet/frame not
> | >>>>>>> in it's own subnet will forward to the gateway no?
> | >>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>> Regards,
> | >>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>> Mike.
> | >>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>> On 22 Oct 2010, at 23:22, Stuart Burns
> | >>>>>>> <stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
> | >>>>>>> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>> wrote:
> | >>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> Hiya,
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> Is anyone really good with pfsense.
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> I have a small pc to function as a pfsense router.
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> It has 3 interfaces - LAN,WAN,OPT
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> The LAN is *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud
> | >>>>>>>> attempt from "10.0.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner
> | >>>>>>>> warning: numerical links are often malicious:
> | >>>>>>>> 10.0.0.0/16**<http://10.0.0.0/16>***
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> WAN is provided by DHCP
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> The last interface is *MailScanner has detected a
> | >>>>>>>> possible fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
> | >>>>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>**MailScanner has detected a
> | >>>>>>>> possible fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
> | >>>>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>***MailScanner has detected a
> | >>>>>>>> possible fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be
> | >>>>>>>> *MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious:
> | >>>>>>>> 172.16.0.0/24** <http://172.16.0.0/24>***
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> Now I can get all the routes talking to each other.
> | >>>>>>>> However I cant get the 172.16.0.0 to use a default route
> | >>>>>>>> to push it out the DHCP assigned WAN interface. I cant see
> | >>>>>>>> anywhere to say any traffic with no explicit route, route
> | >>>>>>>> via WAN.
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> Anyone know if its even possible ?
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> Regards
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> Stuart
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> ***
> | >>>>>>> ***
> | >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> | >>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
> | >>>>>>>>
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> | >>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | >>>>>>> ***
> | >>>>>>> ***
> | >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> | >>>>>>> Chester mailing list
> | >>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> | >>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | >>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>> ***
> | >>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>> ***
> | >>>>>>> ***
> | >>>>>> ***
> | >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> | >>>>>>> Chester mailing list
> | >>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> | >>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | >>>>>> --
> | >>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous
> | >>>>>> content by ***MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>**,
> | >>>>>> and is
> | >>>>>> believed to be clean. ***
> | >>>>> **
> | >>>>>> *_______________________________________________**
> | >>>>>> Chester mailing list
> | >>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> | >>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | >>>>>> *
> | >>>>> *
> | >>>>> --
> | >>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous
> | >>>>> content by **MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>*, and
> | >>>>> is believed to be clean. ***
> | >>>>> **_______________________________________________****
> | >>>>> Chester mailing list
> | >>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> | >>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | >>>>> **
> | >>>> **
> | >>>> --
> | >>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content
> | >>>> by *MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed
> | >>>> to be clean. **
> | >>>> **
> | >>>> **
> | >>>>
> | >>>> **
> | >>>> _______________________________________________
> | >>>> Chester mailing list
> | >>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> | >>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | >>>> **
> | >>> --
> | >>> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content
> | >>> by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> | >>>
> | >>>
> | >>> _______________________________________________
> | >>> Chester mailing list
> | >>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> | >>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | >>>
> | >> _______________________________________________
> | >> Chester mailing list
> | >> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> | >> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | > _______________________________________________
> | > Chester mailing list
> | > Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> | > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | >
> |
> |
> | --
> | This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> | MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | ------------------------------
> |
> | Message: 2
> | Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 20:29:27 +0000
> | From: Stuart Burns <stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>
> | Subject: Re: [Chester LUG] ccna etc
> | To: chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> | Message-ID:
> | <AANLkTi=db0try8UsYy3r6=zkGDDha2G7fWem8=uSBWFX at mail.gmail.com>
> | Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> |
> | If anyone is interested, I am (trying) to run the networking course
> | again before end of Jan. Taught by a pro lecturer. It's a basics and
> | intermediate day long hands on.
> |
> | Cost would be less than ?100 each. Would prolly need 7 people or so.
> |
> | Just putting it out there.
> |
> | Stu
> |
> | On 2 November 2010 20:04, Nev <nev at nevstah.co.uk> wrote:
> |
> | > hiya
> | >
> | > i did mine with commsupport and was really pleased with it all..
> | > just need to practise lots till i'm ready for the exam!!
> | >
> | > i work in nantwich and also drive! i dont have any of the kit tho.
> | > i'm
> | sure
> | > we could all get together and help each other pass!
> | >
> | > ta
> | >
> | > nev
> | >
> | >
> | > On 02/11/2010 14:38, Michael Crilly wrote:
> | >
> | >> Good stuff Nev.
> | >>
> | >> I don't think I will do a course. I have a CCNA kit at home, so
> | >> I'm confident I can self study it all.
> | >>
> | >> If I had a car, I would suggest lugging the kit somewhere we can
> | >> meet up at so we can both mess around with it, but I don't have
> | >> that luxury.
> | >>
> | >> I would be up for a meet up with you and Thomas to swap
> | >> resources. I have a CCNA set of books too which have Cisco videos
> | >> on.
> | >>
> | >> Let me know.
> | >>
> | >> Regards,
> | >>
> | >> Mike.
> | >>
> | >> On 2 Nov 2010, at 14:34, Thomas
> | >> Prophett<thomas at thomasprophett.co.uk> wrote:
> | >>
> | >> Nev
> | >>>
> | >>> Who did you do the ccna course with?
> | >>>
> | >>> Thomas.
> | >>>
> | >>> On 2 November 2010 14:28, Nev<nev at nevstah.co.uk> wrote:
> | >>>
> | >>>> hi mike
> | >>>>
> | >>>> thanks for the welcome
> | >>>>
> | >>>> sorry for the slow reply. was on the ccna course all last week
> | >>>> in manchester, manic to say the least!
> | >>>> i just need to practise so i can take the exam now!!
> | >>>>
> | >>>> i've not heard of train signal before! i got a bunch of videos
> | >>>> from the folks i trained with, maybe a swap would be in order!
> | >>>>
> | >>>> ta
> | >>>>
> | >>>> nev
> | >>>>
> | >>>>
> | >>>> On 23/10/10 11:26, Michael Crilly wrote:
> | >>>>
> | >>>>> Hi Nev,
> | >>>>>
> | >>>>> Welcome to the list :)
> | >>>>>
> | >>>>> I'm self studying a large majority of the course and if I feel
> | >>>>> confident,
> | >>>>> go for the exams. If not, I'm going to do a five day crash
> | >>>>> course with a lot
> | >>>>> of the material already covered.
> | >>>>>
> | >>>>> If you fancy getting together, I can give you a copy of the
> | >>>>> Train Signal
> | >>>>> videos I have which are decent :)
> | >>>>>
> | >>>>> Let me know mate.
> | >>>>>
> | >>>>> Regards,
> | >>>>>
> | >>>>> Mike.
> | >>>>>
> | >>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:55, Nev<nev at nevstah.co.uk
> | >>>>> <mailto:nev at nevstah.co.uk>> wrote:
> | >>>>>
> | >>>>> hi mike
> | >>>>>>
> | >>>>>> where are you doing ccna? and hows it going? I'm starting
> | >>>>>> tomorrow!
> | >>>>>>
> | >>>>>> nev
> | >>>>>>
> | >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> | >>>>>>
> | >>>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:03, Michael
> | >>>>>> Crilly<mrcrilly at googlemail.com
> | >>>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>> wrote:
> | >>>>>>
> | >>>>>> Hit it with a stick.
> | >>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>> I need to sit down with you Stuart an pick your brains on
> | >>>>>>> networking fundamentals. I'm doing my CCNA at present.
> | >>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>> Besides we aint seen each other for some time now :)
> | >>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>> Regards,
> | >>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>> Mike.
> | >>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 09:50, Stuart
> | >>>>>>> Burns<stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
> | >>>>>>> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>> wrote:
> | >>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>> I agre but the problem is how do I tell it which gateway is
> | default,
> | >>>>>>>> ie
> | >>>>>>>> the WAN:)
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> On 23 October 2010 07:33, Michael
> | >>>>>>>> Crilly<mrcrilly at googlemail.com
> | >>>>>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>> wrote:
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> Isn't that done via the gateway IP you supply to each
> | >>>>>>>> host? Usually a router/switch that gets a packet/frame not
> | >>>>>>>> in it's own subnet will forward to the gateway no?
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> Regards,
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> Mike.
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> On 22 Oct 2010, at 23:22, Stuart Burns
> | >>>>>>>> <stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
> | >>>>>>>> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>> wrote:
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> Hiya,
> | >>>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>>> Is anyone really good with pfsense.
> | >>>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>>> I have a small pc to function as a pfsense router.
> | >>>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>>> It has 3 interfaces - LAN,WAN,OPT
> | >>>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>>> The LAN is *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud
> | >>>>>>>>> attempt from "10.0.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner
> | >>>>>>>>> warning: numerical links are often malicious:
> | >>>>>>>>> 10.0.0.0/16**<http://10.0.0.0/16>***
> | >>>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>>> WAN is provided by DHCP
> | >>>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>>> The last interface is *MailScanner has detected a
> | >>>>>>>>> possible fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
> | >>>>>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>**MailScanner has detected a
> | >>>>>>>>> possible fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
> | >>>>>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>***MailScanner has detected a
> | >>>>>>>>> possible fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be
> | >>>>>>>>> *MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious:
> | >>>>>>>>> 172.16.0.0/24** <http://172.16.0.0/24>***
> | >>>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>>> Now I can get all the routes talking to each other.
> | >>>>>>>>> However I cant get the 172.16.0.0 to use a default route
> | >>>>>>>>> to push it out the DHCP assigned WAN interface. I cant see
> | >>>>>>>>> anywhere to say any traffic with no explicit route, route
> | >>>>>>>>> via WAN.
> | >>>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>>> Anyone know if its even possible ?
> | >>>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>>> Regards
> | >>>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>>> Stuart
> | >>>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>>> ***
> | >>>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> ***
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> | >>>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
> | >>>>>>>>>
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> | >>>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | >>>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> ***
> | >>>>>>>> ***
> | >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> | >>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
> | >>>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> | >>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> ***
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> ***
> | >>>>>>>> ***
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>> ***
> | >>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> | >>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
> | >>>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> | >>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | >>>>>>>>
> | >>>>>>> --
> | >>>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> | >>>>>>> dangerous content by
> | >>>>>>> ***MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/
> | >>>>>>> >**,
> | >>>>>>> and is
> | >>>>>>> believed to be clean. ***
> | >>>>>>>
> | >>>>>> **
> | >>>>>>
> | >>>>>>> *_______________________________________________**
> | >>>>>>> Chester mailing list
> | >>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> | >>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | >>>>>>> *
> | >>>>>>>
> | >>>>>> *
> | >>>>>> --
> | >>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> | >>>>>> dangerous content by
> | >>>>>> **MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>*, and
> | >>>>>> is
> | >>>>>> believed to be clean. ***
> | >>>>>> **_______________________________________________****
> | >>>>>> Chester mailing list
> | >>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> | >>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | >>>>>> **
> | >>>>>>
> | >>>>> **
> | >>>>> --
> | >>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> | >>>>> dangerous content by
> | >>>>> *MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> | >>>>> believed to be clean. **
> | >>>>> **
> | >>>>> **
> | >>>>>
> | >>>>> **
> | >>>>> _______________________________________________
> | >>>>> Chester mailing list
> | >>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> | >>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | >>>>> **
> | >>>>>
> | >>>> --
> | >>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> | >>>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> | >>>> believed to be clean.
> | >>>>
> | >>>>
> | >>>> _______________________________________________
> | >>>> Chester mailing list
> | >>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> | >>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | >>>>
> | >>>> _______________________________________________
> | >>> Chester mailing list
> | >>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> | >>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | >>>
> | >> _______________________________________________
> | >> Chester mailing list
> | >> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> | >> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | >>
> | >>
> | >
> | > --
> | > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> | > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> | > believed to be clean.
> | >
> | >
> | > _______________________________________________
> | > Chester mailing list
> | > Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> | > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> | >
> | -------------- next part --------------
> | An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> | URL:
> |
> <
> http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/chester/attachments/20101102/42a64557/a
> | ttachment.htm>
> |
> | ------------------------------
> |
> | _______________________________________________
> | Chester mailing list
> | Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> | https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> |
> |
> | End of Chester Digest, Vol 174, Issue 3
> | ***************************************
> |
> |
> | _______________________________________________
> | Chester mailing list
> | Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> | https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>
>
> --
> Ben Arnold
> Chester, UK
>
> e: ben at seawolfsanctuary.com @ benarnold at fsfe.org
> w: seawolfsanctuary.com | linkedin.com/in/benarnold
>
> nom = { :cookies => :mouth }
> nom; nom; nom
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>
>
> End of Chester Digest, Vol 176, Issue 1
> ***************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/chester/attachments/20101116/0bc431c2/attachment.html>
More information about the Chester
mailing list