[dundee] Re: dundee Digest, Vol 118, Issue 1

[Mirosław Majka]

dundee-request at mailman.lug.org.uk pisze:
> Send dundee mailing list submissions to
> 	dundee at lists.lug.org.uk
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dundee
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	dundee-request at lists.lug.org.uk
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	dundee-owner at lists.lug.org.uk
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of dundee digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. LFS (Nistur)
>    2. Re: LFS (Digit (SG))
>    3. Re: LFS (Lee Hughes)
>    4. Re: gooey boy gets bashed (Lee Hughes)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:12:49 +0000
> From: Nistur <nistur at googlemail.com>
> Subject: [dundee] LFS
> To: "Tayside Linux User Group" <dundee at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> Message-ID:
> 	<be94702a0710141612ke7e66f2w58c3b3ec8b77c82d at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I think this question is mainly aimed at Arron, but also, as usual, feel
> free to comment and put your word in, as such I will address it to the list.
>
> Arron suggested that there be, sort of alongside the install-fest I think,
> an LFS building group. Whereas he thinks that it should be done in several
> sessions I believe that what would be better to do is something like two
> weekend sessions, however far apart people want to give themselves time. The
> reason behind this is that the hardest parts for LFS are the start, building
> the toolchain and then finishing, installing the kernel. Stuff inbetween
> just takes time and is mainly ./configure && make && make install then read
> the package info while it's busy. With the 2 weekends, if we get a few newer
> users, or at least people who haven't tried LFS before, and a couple of...
> more "mature" users (not agewise before people get offended) to build
> alongside if they want, but mainly just to help iron out problems. I can put
> myself forward if I'm wanted in this position as I've built LFS a few times
> (many times if you include failed attempts)
>
> I think this would be a great thing for the society to do at least, if not
> the LUG as well. Firstly it will teach new users some more of the command
> line. Whereas I don't think we have anyone who is actually scared of it,
> knowing the system in depth isn't needed for all linux users, just
> comfortable enough with it to be able to follow some of the guides online,
> for example. Also if this is a success then it could be continued to adding
> portions of BLFS and looking at some of the other projects. Eventually, if
> it all comes together it may be possible to create a liveCD/installer for
> Abertay Students with things like OOo and wpa_supplicant. I realise this
> would be much easier, taking say an ubuntu CD, especially for support,
> however having a society that knows the distro inside out has got to be
> worth something in that arguement, right?
>
> I believe that's all for my babbling
> Nistur
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/dundee/attachments/20071015/d70254d9/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:22:25 +0100
> From: "Digit (SG)" <digit.siljrath at googlemail.com>
> Subject: Re: [dundee] LFS
> To: "Tayside Linux User Group" <dundee at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> Message-ID:
> 	<7227ba6b0710141622q385daf49ndc44acfae6883dc0 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> i like babbling
>
> On 15/10/2007, Nistur <nistur at googlemail.com> wrote:
>   
>> I think this question is mainly aimed at Arron, but also, as usual, feel
>> free to comment and put your word in, as such I will address it to the list.
>>
>> Arron suggested that there be, sort of alongside the install-fest I think,
>> an LFS building group. Whereas he thinks that it should be done in several
>> sessions I believe that what would be better to do is something like two
>> weekend sessions, however far apart people want to give themselves time. The
>> reason behind this is that the hardest parts for LFS are the start, building
>> the toolchain and then finishing, installing the kernel. Stuff inbetween
>> just takes time and is mainly ./configure && make && make install then read
>> the package info while it's busy. With the 2 weekends, if we get a few newer
>> users, or at least people who haven't tried LFS before, and a couple of...
>> more "mature" users (not agewise before people get offended) to build
>> alongside if they want, but mainly just to help iron out problems. I can put
>> myself forward if I'm wanted in this position as I've built LFS a few times
>> (many times if you include failed attempts)
>>
>> I think this would be a great thing for the society to do at least, if not
>> the LUG as well. Firstly it will teach new users some more of the command
>> line. Whereas I don't think we have anyone who is actually scared of it,
>> knowing the system in depth isn't needed for all linux users, just
>> comfortable enough with it to be able to follow some of the guides online,
>> for example. Also if this is a success then it could be continued to adding
>> portions of BLFS and looking at some of the other projects. Eventually, if
>> it all comes together it may be possible to create a liveCD/installer for
>> Abertay Students with things like OOo and wpa_supplicant. I realise this
>> would be much easier, taking say an ubuntu CD, especially for support,
>> however having a society that knows the distro inside out has got to be
>> worth something in that arguement, right?
>>
>> I believe that's all for my babbling
>> Nistur
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dundee GNU/Linux Users Group mailing list
>> dundee at lists.lug.org.uk  http://dundee.lug.org.uk
>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dundee
>> Chat on IRC, #tlug on dundee.lug.org.uk
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   
Well, personally I think LFS is sodomy. Really, you'd have to be 
desparate to the bone to get new users to try THAT! I think that gentoo 
is just the same idea but packed in a better, more efficient way. With 
LFS you don't get any tools to control borken libraries! No dependency 
tree, nothing! Believe me, I've been using that for more than two years. 
After that time I realised that I got into a dead end with managing 
software.

Cheers,

Miroslaw

-- 
UNIX is like sex: If you don't know it, you don't miss is. But if you know it, you'll need it.