[members at lugog] Introduction:
stoker
stoker at headweb.co.uk
Thu Nov 25 19:25:50 UTC 2010
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:43:49 +0000, Damian <myth at surr.co.uk> wrote:
> On 25/11/2010 12:00, glastonbury-request at mailman.lug.org.uk wrote:
>> It goes back to when *buntu first came on the scene and lots of people
>> I knew who had been staunch Debian users abandoned it for *buntu for
>> no apparent reason. I still don't understand why they did so as
>> *buntu didn't seem to offer any benefits over Debian or any of the
>> other offshoots at the time.
> I think one of the main reason lots of people went to Ubuntu was because
> lots of people went to Ubuntu!
that was a factor, no doubt .
>
> There was suddenly one distro with a huge user base that was trying it's
> best to be a purely GUI experience.
>
> Also, Linux had been getting better and better for years, but I never
> stayed with any version because they were just too geeky. In Windows, I
> considered myself a geek. If anyone had a Windows problem, I was the one
> they called on to fix it. In Linux, that was out of the water. Anything
> that went wrong needed the command line. And what do you put into the
> command line? Who knows! It's all very simple when you know how, but
> mind bogglingly impossible when you don't. Your average geek doesn't
> mind poking around a system to tweek this and that, but having to user
> the command line for everything was just too much.
>
> I use the command line a fair bit now, but the less it's 'needed' the
> better *IF* the end goal is to compete with Windows.
Exactly my thoughts, if only because windows command line is redunudant
pretty much except for specialized tasks,
If that's not the
> end goal, then the uber-geeks can keep happy on the command line.
> There's absolutely nothing wrong with that, but that's never going to
> impact on Windows. No one wants to 'upgrade' to an OS where they will
> need more support than they used to, what's the point of that?
>
no point at all...
> Replacing Windows isn't my end goal. I just like the feel of good open
> source software and while ever the work involved in using that is within
> my available time and capabilities I will stick with it. I've had a
> MythTV home cinema system for years now, but a couple of times with a
> couple of the really nasty problems that have taken weeks of forum
> support to iron out, I have been VERY close to packing it all in and
> installing Windows media centre. Why, because for £XX I can get a system
> that pretty much just works, and the bits that don't are well within my
> grasp to fix. I'm getting to that point with Ubuntu now. I'm sure the
> other distros have caught up in terms of 'GUI for everything' and the
> end user in mind, but I certainly think that Ubuntu lead the way and it
> was a very important growth for Linux as a whole.
>
> My god, that turned into a rant! Who's side am I on?
>
After that, I'm not sure......lol however your persistance with myth tv is
admirable....
> The main point I was wanting to make was the first one. Suddenly there
> was one distro with a huge user base rather than hundreds of distros
> (way too much chose for someone starting with little/no knowledge) with
> much smaller user bases.
>
> Back in my box.
>
> Cheers all
> Damian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Glastonbury Linux User Group mailing list
> Glastonbury at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/glastonbury
>
> User group website: http://www.lugog.org.uk/
More information about the Glastonbury
mailing list