[Gllug] Mozilla on Redhat 7.1

[Brent Geach]

Nope.
Normally I've seen that
1st number = major release
2nd	   = minor code changes
3rd	   = bug fixes and patches

the beta and alpha releases usually have a b or a at the end.
I may be wrong though, but this is the algorithum I've always understood it to be.


On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 10:39:03AM +0000, Jim Bailey wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I maybe talking windows here but doesn't an odd number at the end of a 
> version mean unstable development version maybe if you downloaded 0.9.2 
> it may be more stable.  I have been running Mozilla 0.8 something or 
> other on Debian stable for a few days now with only 1 crash.
> 
> Cheers Jim
> 
> "Selfishness is not doing what you want to do. It's making other people 
> do what you want to do."
> 
> Oscar Wilde
> 
> On Wednesday, August 8, 2001, at 10:21 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 10:00:06AM +0000, t.clarke wrote:
> >
> >> Has anyone any experience with mozilla as installed by default on 
> >> Redhat 7.1?
> >
> > No, but seduced by the line that 0.9.3 was now much better than any
> > previous Mozilla I decided to give it another try, downloaded it all
> > (over modem), got it running, was initially impressed and went to
> > bed happy.  9 hours later I return to find no mozilla windows and
> > every time I tried to start it I got a core dump.  Sighed and went
> > back to Opera.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
> > http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug
> >
> 
> -- 
> Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
> http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug
> 
> 

-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug