[Gllug] Re: [bristol] NFS client for Windows
Rob Levine
rob_levine at hotmail.com
Sat Jun 23 10:54:17 UTC 2001
Dear Dave,
I was really after some sort of head-to-head test of samba vs nfs - but I'll
take your word for it if there are no good clients around.
The issue arose because on my 100Mbit switched network I only get about 25%
of the speed I expect between Linux and Windows when copying files. However,
having just set up NFS between two Linux boxes, I get transfer rates near
the max of the network. I was just going to play around with different file
sharing methods...
Thanks,
Rob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Hodgkinson" <daveh at hodgkinson.org>
To: <bristol at lists.lug.org.uk>
Cc: <gllug at linux.co.uk>
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 9:40 AM
Subject: [Gllug] Re: [bristol] NFS client for Windows
> "Rob Levine" <rob_levine at hotmail.com> writes:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Can anyone recommend a good (free) NFS client for W2K?
>
> nooooo! Use samba on the server. NFS on Windows is, IMHFO, pants.
>
> --
> Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodgkinson.org
> Editor-in-chief, The Highway Star http://www.deep-purple.com
> Interim CTO, web server farms, technical strategy
> ----------------------------------------
>
> --
> Gllug mailing list - Gllug at linux.co.uk
> http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug
>
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list