[Gllug] You can still stop the next M$ monopoly?!

[Axel Segebrecht]

Just found this from ZDnet:
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/20010629/tc/you_can_still_stop_the_next_ms_monopoly_1.html

David Coursey's ideas as to why M$ will still be a monopoly and how one might 
stop it dead in it's tracks.

IMHO what he says it's true, however I don't see a way of achieving stopping 
them. It all sounds a bit dodgy, making someone wait until their competitors 
are ready to compete and all that. It just doesn't sound like an "open" 
market place anymore.

Although I do understand the reasons, there doesn't seem to be a "leg to 
stand on"? Or is there... .

-- 
rg, Axel
Visit http://smatrix.de/axelsegebrecht.html
Chat on ICQ# 82599857
Call me on (44)  07931 387 986

--
Six lines of code that have rattled the movie industry :-) 
Movies want to be free...

s''$/=\2048;while(<>){G=29;R=142;if((@a=unqT="C*",_)[20]&48){D=89;_=unqb24,qT,@
b=map{ord qB8,unqb8,qT,_^$a[-D]}@INC;s/...$/1$&/;Q=unqV,qb25,_;H=73;O=$b[4]<<9
|256|$b[3];Q=Q>>8^(P=(E=255)&(Q>>12^Q>>4^Q/8^Q))<<17,O=O>>8^(E&(F=(S=O>>14&7^O)
^S*8^S<<6))<<9,_=(map{U=_%16orE^=R^=110&(S=(unqT,"\xb\ntd\xbz\x14d")[_/16%8]);E 
^=(72, at z=(64,72,G^=12*(U-2?0:S&17)),H^=_%64?12:0, at z)[_%8]}(16..271))[_]^((D>>=8 
)+=P+(~F&E))for at a[128..$#a]}print+qT, at a}';s/[D-HO-U_]/\$$&/g;s/q/pack+/g;eval

-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug