[Gllug] Ogg Vorbis encoding
David Irvine
co2cool at yahoo.com
Mon Oct 22 23:02:29 UTC 2001
On Mon, 2001-10-22 at 23:38, John Davies wrote:
> > Whats the
> > advantages/Disadvantages of .ogg'ing
> > rather than .mp3'ing? Am i correct in saying that
> > you get the same
> > quality for less bps in .ogg than mp3?
> >From a technical standpoint that is true (supposedly).
> Ogg has a better "pyscho-acoustic" model than mp3 so
> it should sound better. I think independent tests have
> proved this - but maybe not conclusively.
Now you mention it, i do find oggs sound alittle better up loud in the
car, the bass isnt as prone to clipping.
>
> The reason that I use it is that it is unencumbered by
> patents and is free as in free speech.
That i did not know.
>
> A disadvantage of ogg is that it is slower to encode a
> file than some of the mp3 encoders.
Heh yeah i thought it took a little longer to encode using oggenc. I just put it down to not being on a super fast computer :D
Cheers
David
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list