[Gllug] GNOME Disk Activity

Sudhir Anand anand_sudhir at yahoo.co.uk
Fri Dec 13 07:03:17 UTC 2002


On Friday 13 December 2002 01:10, Mike Brodbelt wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 13:31, Sudhir Anand wrote:
> > If on PCs that I install Linux/KDE/Gnome are off the shelf and it is
> > difficult to use Gnome but KDE is easier, then KDE is a more stable
> > platform.
>
> Rubbish - that's down to the distro. Suse does a very competent job of
> packaging KDE, and a rather poorer job of packaging GNOME. RedHat tends
> to do the reverse. Off the shelf very much depends on whose shelf....
>
> If you compared self compiled versions of both on a system with neither
> installed, the comparison would be fair - otherwise what your actually
> comparing is the packaging.

Fair point.  I have only used SuSE ditributions, primarily because of cost 
considerations.  I also accept that SuSE is heavily KDE-centric in which case 
Gnome support could be better.

Sudhir Anand
Andson

-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug




More information about the GLLUG mailing list