[Gllug] BB4::excel
Nix
nix at esperi.demon.co.uk
Mon May 27 21:05:44 UTC 2002
On Mon, 27 May 2002, tet at accucard.com yowled:
>
>>If I have understood the home page correctly and got my own
>>understanding of 'Open Source' vs 'Free Software' it could be considered
>>the former and please Mr. Raymond but is not 'Free Software' and
>>therefore not please Mr. Stallman. Is this right or am I once more
>>barking completely up the wrong tree at squirrels long since gone?
>
> Close, but no cigar. The difference between the two is actually almost
> negligible. Originally, Open Source was intended to be a rebranding of
> Free Software, to make it more appealing to corporate types. The two
> were the same thing. Then the Open Source Initiative approved a license
> that the FSF found objectionable, and hence RMS launched himself on his
> current crusade to distance himself from "Open Source".
RMS was endeavouring to distance himself long before that, because he
felt that throwing away the moral/political issues was a seriously bad
idea. (I agree, FWIW.)
--
`Well, if you think about it, Andrew is a strategic part of the Internet.'
--- Kieran on Andrew Gierth
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list