[Gllug] NTFS RW

[will]

Stephen Harker wrote:
> On 16 May 2002, Nix wrote:
> 
> 
>>On Thu, 16 May 2002, Kim Hawtin said:
>>
>>>is it not still an experimental file system?
>>
>>2.4 NTFS writing? More `quite broken and FS-corrupting'.
>>
>>I guess you could call that `experimental'; but it'd have to be the mad
>>scientist, exploding lab, definition.
> 
> 
> You're damn right. It COMPLETELY shafted beyond recognition the NTFS 
> partition I was trying to 'FIX'. DO NOT USE LINUX NTFS IN READ/WRITE MODE!
> I repeat. DO NOT etc...
> Just Don't do it!
> Bollocks! So anyway, there goes that database.... gurgle gurgle. Piss on 
> Bill Gates and all he stands for!! And piss on the person who wrote that 
> NTFS code. GRRRRRRR. I saw the signs and I read the warnings and I still 
> tried it so I only have myself to blame.

This is why I did my win2k patition as fat32.  NTFS FFS.

> MMmmmm. Beer is good.

does his count as a solution, or as a workaround?

Will (beer good).



-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug