[Gllug] Reason behind groups
Jonathan Dye
jonathan.dye at automationpartnership.com
Tue Oct 15 13:47:57 UTC 2002
Hi,
I've noticed several distributions that by default set the group of new
users to have the same name as the user.
i.e.
User X has primary group X
but I can't see a good reason to have it this way. On all the systems that
I've used before the users are members of meaningful groups like 'students'
or 'software' etc which means you can allow read access to your peers but
no-one else. With the above scheme you can only allow access to yourself as
each group only has one user.
Can anyone suggest why it is this way?
JD
--
Jonathan Dye, The Automation Partnership(Cambridge) Ltd
Registered Office: York Way, Royston, Hertfordshire, SG8 5WY, UK
Registered in England, Company No:2823205
http://www.automationpartnership.com
Tel: +44 1763 227 403 Fax: +44 1763 227 201
mailto:jonathan.dye at automationpartnership.com
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list