[Gllug] Seeking For Help
Stig Brautaset
gllug at brautaset.org
Mon Apr 7 21:15:58 UTC 2003
On Apr 07 2003, Pete wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 11:58:04AM +0100, Andrew Halliwell wrote:
> > And verily, didst Mr Simon Johnson announce to the hordes:
> > > DEAR SIR/MADAM,
> >
> > Etc etc, sierra leone blah blah, millions of dollars blah blah...
> >
> > How the FECK did this get past the spam assassin filters?
>
> I've read somewhere that about 5 times as much traffic is generated by
> people talking about spam, as spam itself.
Yep. Probably much more on certain lists. When I used to hang on
debian-user, the problem became so bad that I hacked up a procmail
recipe to get rid of the bastards. Here it is, in its current form:
# If Bogofilter or SpamAssassin triggers, make sure we plonk followups
# to the message too.
:0
* 1^0 ^X-Bogosity: Yes, tests=bogofilter
* 1^0 ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
* 1^0 ? formail -c -x"References:" -x"In-Reply-To:" | fgrep -is -f $spam_ids
{
# tag spam so we can stop followups to it
:0 ch:
| formail -x"Message-Id:" >> $spam_ids
# if caught by bogofilter
:0 :
* ^X-Bogosity: Yes, tests=bogofilter
$bogofilter
# if caught by spamassassin
:0 :
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
$spamassassin
# if we get here then it was a followup to spam
# Invaluable on e.g. debian-user.
:0 :
$followups
}
> > it must have at least 30 points worth of spamworthyness in the first 5
> > lines!
>
> FWIW, it didn't get past my filters.
Neither mine. Nor did your reply to it, but I occasionally browse the spam
folders to see if there was any false positives. This happens a bit more often
than usual at the moment since I only recently installed bogofilter.
Stig
--
brautaset.org
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list