[Gllug] Cyclists (off topic)

[Xander D Harkness]

On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 10:37, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 10:13, Andrew Halliwell wrote:
> > Besides, if it's a pedestrian crossing and there's not a pedestrian in
> > sight...where's the harm? If I inch forward at a junction with traffic
> > lights and see no traffic in either direction, where's the harm?
> 
> It's illegal. Traffic lights are _not_ optional.  At a red light, you
> must stop.  At a red/amber light, you must stop. At an amber light, you
> must stop.
Amber is stop with other provisions:

AMBER means 'Stop' at the stopline. You may go on only if the AMBER
appears after you have crossed the stop line or are so close to it that
to pull up might cause an accident

http://www.highwaycode.gov.uk/signs01.shtml

:-)

Xander
> 
> I'm sorry if I'm stating the obvious, but you seem to be missing this
> key point.
> 
> Regards
> -- 
> Martin A. Brooks, Clues Ltd
> http://www.clues.ltd.uk/
> 


-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug