[Gllug] Cyclists (off topic)

[Andrew Halliwell]

And verily, didst Martin A. Brooks announce to the hordes:
> 
> On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 10:13, Andrew Halliwell wrote:
> > Besides, if it's a pedestrian crossing and there's not a pedestrian in
> > sight...where's the harm? If I inch forward at a junction with traffic
> > lights and see no traffic in either direction, where's the harm?
> 
> It's illegal. Traffic lights are _not_ optional.  At a red light, you
> must stop.  At a red/amber light, you must stop. At an amber light, you
> must stop.
> 
> I'm sorry if I'm stating the obvious, but you seem to be missing this
> key point.

Nope. Didn't miss any points... I admit it, I flout the law when it's of no
consequence...

But then, everyone's guilty of ignoring inconvenient laws once in a while.

-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug