[Gllug] SCO again

[David Damerell]

On , 11 Aug 2003, Mike Brodbelt wrote:
>Theoretically, were I to make the assumption (which I don't) that their
>claims had any merit whatsoever, I could grab that SRPM, unpack it,
>apply the kernel.org patches from 2.4.13 to bring it up to 2.4.21, and
>have a source tree where all the disputed code has been distributed to
>me, under the GPL, by the purported copyright holder.

A friend of mine at IBM is quite pleased about this. :-)

-- 
David Damerell <damerell at chiark.greenend.org.uk> Distortion Field!

-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug